The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Rulings on Trustee's Duty to Diversify: What Have We Learned?
- Navy Sailor's Death Implicates Maritime Law
- Circuit Rejects Restitution for Victim of Child Porn
- State Accepts Settlement to End Warehousing of Mental Patients
- Two Civil Court Races, Rockland Family Court Contest on Ballot
- Partner Killed on 9/11 Recalled as 'Always Available to Help'
- Harris Beach Remembers Its Staffers Killed on 9/11
- Aftermath of Rain Again Closes Orange County Court
- State Bar to Offer Free Advice to Aid Flood Victims
- Split Panel Upholds City's Environmental Review
- Judge Sanctions Lawyer for Missed Deposition
- Personal Notes on Lawyers
- Araujo v. Mercer Square Owners Corp.
- Nouveau Elevator Industries Inc. v. Kabbalah Centre of NY Inc.
- Prompt Mortgage Providers of North America LLC v. Direct Realty LLC
- Mukasey v. Curatola
- Cervera v. Queens Ballpark Co. LLC
- Matter of 25-50 FLB LLC v. Srinivasan
- Richards v. United States
- Prendergast v. Analog Modules Inc.
- Dwyer v. Goldman Sachs Headquarters LLC
- Litchhult v. USTRIVE2 Inc.
- Polanco v. Brookdale Hospital Medical Center
- Outside Counsel: 'Marvel' and the Importance of Careful Drafting in Transferring IP Rights
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| Rulings on Trustee's Duty to Diversify: What Have We Learned? | Top |
| In his Trusts and Estates column, C. Raymond Radigan, of counsel to Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, writes that in 1987, the New York Court of Appeals held that a bank was negligent for failing to diversify trust holdings of Kodak stock.1 Since then, several New York cases examined whether a bank trustee was negligent for failing to diversify investments. | |
| Navy Sailor's Death Implicates Maritime Law | Top |
| In their Admiralty Law column, James E. Mercante, a partner at Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, and Daniel O. Rose, a partner at Kreindler & Kreindler, write that, generally, a serviceman who is injured or killed during active duty is barred from recovering against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for any negligence of his or her fellow serviceman by well-settled doctrine. | |
| Circuit Rejects Restitution for Victim of Child Porn | Top |
| A defendant who viewed pornographic images of a child cannot be forced to pay for the victim's counseling costs because she cannot show that his actions caused the trauma that made the treatment necessary, an appellate court has ruled. | |
| State Accepts Settlement to End Warehousing of Mental Patients | Top |
| Two Civil Court Races, Rockland Family Court Contest on Ballot | Top |
| Partner Killed on 9/11 Recalled as 'Always Available to Help' | Top |
| Harris Beach Remembers Its Staffers Killed on 9/11 | Top |
| Aftermath of Rain Again Closes Orange County Court | Top |
| State Bar to Offer Free Advice to Aid Flood Victims | Top |
| Split Panel Upholds City's Environmental Review | Top |
| Judge Sanctions Lawyer for Missed Deposition | Top |
| Personal Notes on Lawyers | Top |
| Araujo v. Mercer Square Owners Corp. | Top |
| Commercial, Residential Condo Unit Owners Denied Dismissal of Trip and Fall Action | |
| Nouveau Elevator Industries Inc. v. Kabbalah Centre of NY Inc. | Top |
| Contract Mutually Cancellable Upon 90 Days Notice, Not 90 Days Before Expiration | |
| Prompt Mortgage Providers of North America LLC v. Direct Realty LLC | Top |
| No Condition Precedent in Mortgage Requiring Notice to Accelerate Full Payment | |
| Mukasey v. Curatola | Top |
| Patient's Assault and Battery Claim Against Dentist Permitted to Proceed | |
| Cervera v. Queens Ballpark Co. LLC | Top |
| Consideration of Co-Worker's Affidavit Rejected; Triable Issues Preclude Summary Judgment | |
| Matter of 25-50 FLB LLC v. Srinivasan | Top |
| BSA's Decision to Revoke Alteration Permit As Demolition Permit not First Obtained Upheld | |
| Richards v. United States | Top |
| Illegal Re-Entrant Cannot Contest Underlying Proceedings; §2255 Habeas Relief Denied | |
| Prendergast v. Analog Modules Inc. | Top |
| Shocked Laser Technician's Discharge Theory Not Supported, Causation Theory Too Remote | |
| Dwyer v. Goldman Sachs Headquarters LLC | Top |
| Owner, Contractor Denied Indemnification From Subcontractor in Ladder Fall Lawsuit | |
| Litchhult v. USTRIVE2 Inc. | Top |
| Single Offensive Slide, Comment Not 'Severe' Or 'Pervasive' for Pro Se Title VII Bias Suit | |
| Polanco v. Brookdale Hospital Medical Center | Top |
| Wage, Overtime Claims Held Independent Of Bargain Pact Rights, Not Barred by LMRA | |
| Outside Counsel: 'Marvel' and the Importance of Careful Drafting in Transferring IP Rights | Top |
| Daniel C. Glazer and Daniel P. Ashe of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler write that companies regularly enter into intellectual property assignment or "work for hire" arrangements with employees and contractors, often pursuant to form agreements that are not tailored to the particular engagement. However, a recent decision highlights the importance of provisions governing the transfer of rights in new works of authorship. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment