The latest from NYLJ.com
- Wintery Mix: Guidance On Substantive and Procedural Issues
- Air Bag Warning Claim Preempted; 'Scarlet Letter' Sanction Ordered
- Albany: Client Protection Fund Sees Spike in Claims and Payouts in 2010
- Judge Applies Attorney Ethics Rules to Disqualify Whistleblowers From Federal Qui Tam Lawsuit
- Divorcing Wife Cleared to Sue Husband for Theft of Academic Paper
- News In Brief
- Transcripts Show Alleged Inside Trader's Attempts to Avoid Detection
- Obituary: William R. LaMarca
- Correction
- Harris v. City of New York
- Baran v. Swift
- Stevens Van Lines Inc. v. Don's Moving & Storage Inc.
- Salinas v. City of New York
- Gilmore v. DiMaggio's Waterfront Restaurant Inc.
- Novacare Medical PC v. Travelers Property Cas. Ins. Co.
- Stodolski v. Wisselman, Harounian & Associates PC
- United States v. Perez-Frias
- Muller v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
- Matter of Doctor's Associates Inc. v. Gharbaran
- Morrone v. Erlich
- Outside Counsel: 'United States v. Burden': An Errant Exercise in Evidence Law
Wintery Mix: Guidance On Substantive and Procedural Issues | Top |
In her Trusts and Estates Update, Ilene Sherwyn Cooper, a partner with Farrell Fritz, writes that just as this winter has provided us with a mix of sun, clouds, snow, sleet and ice, so, too, has the Surrogate's Court and Appellate Division provided us with an array of opinions to instruct and guide us on substantive and procedural issues affecting trusts and estates practice. | |
Air Bag Warning Claim Preempted; 'Scarlet Letter' Sanction Ordered | Top |
In his Products Liability column, Herzfeld & Rubin member Michael Hoenig discusses how federal preemption of particular automotive claims continue to be a battleground and how the recent Morris v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc. decision holds such a warnings claim to be preempted notwithstanding the Supreme Court's Williamson decision in March. | |
Albany: Client Protection Fund Sees Spike in Claims and Payouts in 2010 | Top |
Judge Applies Attorney Ethics Rules to Disqualify Whistleblowers From Federal Qui Tam Lawsuit | Top |
Divorcing Wife Cleared to Sue Husband for Theft of Academic Paper | Top |
News In Brief | Top |
Transcripts Show Alleged Inside Trader's Attempts to Avoid Detection | Top |
Obituary: William R. LaMarca | Top |
Correction | Top |
Harris v. City of New York | Top |
§§240(1), 241(6) Claims Stemming From Road's Removal From Bridge Are Reinstated | |
Baran v. Swift | Top |
Doctor's Notice to Admit Stricken as Improper, Barred From Use of Patient's Responses | |
Stevens Van Lines Inc. v. Don's Moving & Storage Inc. | Top |
Questions of Fact, Credibility Preclude Summary Judgment Against Storage Facility | |
Salinas v. City of New York | Top |
City Fails to Plead 'Improper Party' As Affirmative Defense in School Injury Case | |
Gilmore v. DiMaggio's Waterfront Restaurant Inc. | Top |
Court Finds Out-of-Possession Landlord Owed No Duty to Tenant's Patron | |
Novacare Medical PC v. Travelers Property Cas. Ins. Co. | Top |
Peer Report Insufficient to Shift Burden To Provider to Submit Opposing Expert Proof | |
Stodolski v. Wisselman, Harounian & Associates PC | Top |
Court Finds Commencement of De Novo Review Effectively Vacates Arbitration Award | |
United States v. Perez-Frias | Top |
Circuit Joins Others in Ruling Enhancement For Alien's Illegal Re-Entry Not Unduly Harsh | |
Muller v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. | Top |
Fox's 2004 Movie 'AVP: Alien vs. Predator' Did Not Infringe on Prior Screenplay | |
Matter of Doctor's Associates Inc. v. Gharbaran | Top |
Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Confirm Arbitral Award; $75,000 Diversity Threshold Not Met | |
Morrone v. Erlich | Top |
Derivative Action Against Military, Security Supplier Dismissed; Prior Demand Not Made | |
Outside Counsel: 'United States v. Burden': An Errant Exercise in Evidence Law | Top |
Litigator Marc Fernich analyzes a Second Circuit case that addressed tow issues: First, a novel application of the Confrontation Clause to recorded remarks by a wired government informant who did not testify at trial and was thus unavailable for cross-examination; and second, more the admissibility of prior consistent statements by an impeached government witness. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment