The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Law Permits Limited 'Waivers' From Corporate Practice Prohibition
- Lost Wages Claims for Undocumented Workers After 'Balbuena'
- Gay Marriage Opponents Attack New Law on Multiple Fronts
- Ex-Officer's Free-Speech Claim Against City Revived by Circuit
- Bankruptcy Court Finds Contract Limiting Damages Enforceable
- 'Helmsley Loophole' Closed In Tax Evasion Prosecutions
- Kelley Drye's Defenses In EEOC Suit Are Narrowed
- Personal Notes on Lawyers
- Decision by Strauss-Kahn's Accuser to Speak Out Could Be Risky Legal Move
- D.C. Circuit Rejects SEC Rule Easing Shareholder Nominations for Boards
- Matter of Shepherd v. New York City Police Department
- Matter of Brenes v. Kelly
- Legend Autorama Ltd. v. Audi of America Inc.
- 380 Yorktown Food Corp. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
- Miller v. Kingston Diagnostic Center
- Sciara v. Surgical Associates of Western NY PC
- United States v. Younis
- Royal Indian Raj Int'l Corp. v. Domains by Proxy, Inc.
- Bellezza v. Holland
- Dukes Bridge LLC v. Security Life of Denver Insur. Co.
- In re: Air Crash Near Clarence Center, N.Y.
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: Innovation in the 21st Century: Patent Standards for Non-Obviousness
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Law Permits Limited 'Waivers' From Corporate Practice Prohibition | Top |
Francis J. Serbaroli, in his Health Law column, reviews a law enacted in 2010 that allows the state Department of Education to grant waivers from the prohibition on corporate practice of the professions for psychotherapists, social workers, and certain other mental health professionals employed by not-for-profit, religious, charitable and educational organizations. He notes that this law carves out a few narrow exceptions, but that the general corporate practice prohibition is still very strict. | |
Lost Wages Claims for Undocumented Workers After 'Balbuena' | Top |
In their Trial Practice column, Robert S. Kelner, senior partner at Kelner & Kelner, and Gail S. Kelner, an attorney at the firm, write that New York's courts are attempting to resolve any conflicts between federal immigration law and state law in a manner that safeguards all workers and deprives employers of incentives to violate the safe workplace mandates of the Labor Law. | |
Gay Marriage Opponents Attack New Law on Multiple Fronts | Top |
Ex-Officer's Free-Speech Claim Against City Revived by Circuit | Top |
Bankruptcy Court Finds Contract Limiting Damages Enforceable | Top |
'Helmsley Loophole' Closed In Tax Evasion Prosecutions | Top |
Kelley Drye's Defenses In EEOC Suit Are Narrowed | Top |
Personal Notes on Lawyers | Top |
Decision by Strauss-Kahn's Accuser to Speak Out Could Be Risky Legal Move | Top |
D.C. Circuit Rejects SEC Rule Easing Shareholder Nominations for Boards | Top |
Matter of Shepherd v. New York City Police Department | Top |
Judge Denies Inmate's Latest FOIL Request as Barred by Time, Res Judicata | |
Matter of Brenes v. Kelly | Top |
Court Upholds Police Pension Fund's Denial Of Accident Disability Retirement Benefits | |
Legend Autorama Ltd. v. Audi of America Inc. | Top |
Audi's COO Granted Dismissal of Dealerships' Tortious Interference With Contract Claims | |
380 Yorktown Food Corp. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. | Top |
A&P's Breach of Non-Competition Provision In Sub-Tenant's Modification of Lease Waived | |
Miller v. Kingston Diagnostic Center | Top |
Defense Counsel Loses Bid to Have Decedent's Attorney Retract Letter to Doctor | |
Sciara v. Surgical Associates of Western NY PC | Top |
'Thompson' Precludes Non-Party Witness' Counsel From Participating in Deposition | |
United States v. Younis | Top |
Severance of Overt Acts Denied on Count Charging Money Transmit Conspiracy | |
Royal Indian Raj Int'l Corp. v. Domains by Proxy, Inc. | Top |
Settlement Enforced as Binding on Parties; Sanctions Warranted for 'Bad Faith' Conduct | |
Bellezza v. Holland | Top |
Inmate Pleads Unjustified Censorship, but His Denial of Court Access Claim Is Rejected | |
Dukes Bridge LLC v. Security Life of Denver Insur. Co. | Top |
Policy's Non-New York Successor-in-Interest Cannot Invoke §1213(c)(1) Protections | |
In re: Air Crash Near Clarence Center, N.Y. | Top |
Federal Care Standards Apply to State Law Negligence Claims in Air Crash Litigation | |
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
Outside Counsel: Innovation in the 21st Century: Patent Standards for Non-Obviousness | Top |
David A. Kalow and Milton Springut of Kalow & Springut write: Recently, in a decision which addressed the issue of when prior art is sufficiently relevant to a claimed invention to be considered in a non-obviousness inquiry, the Federal Circuit reminded the community of inventors and patent professionals that both it and the Supreme Court have a broad view as to what art would be obvious for an inventor to consider when tackling an unsolved problem. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment