The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- TV Channel Bundling, Advertising Inserts and Drugs
- Juveniles And 'Miranda' Warnings
- Albany: Murder Conviction That Was Based on Circumstantial Evidence Upheld
- Panel Finds Suit Should Be Heard by School's Chief, Not the Court
- Davis Polk Pro Bono Counsel Nominated for Federal Bench
- Trustee Says Almost Half of Madoff Losses Recovered
- Judge Sides With Marvel in 'Spider-Man' Dispute
- Defendant Not Persistent Felony Offender, Judge Says
- Judge Finds It 'Entirely Plausible' Lehman's Officers Misled Investors, Permits Class Action to Proceed
- Q&A: Janet DiFiore
- Emotions Run High in Town Hall Meeting to Explain 9/11 Fund
- Wesley v. Smith-Lasofsky
- Matter of City of New York v. Bd. of Collective Bargaining of City of New York
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. NY Central Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
- Breytman v. Schechter
- People v. DiPretoro
- People v. Smith
- Kennedy v. New York Presbyterian Hospital
- Lawson v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
- Stephens-Buie v. Shinseki
- Sommersett v. City of New York
- Salazar v. Bowne Realty Associates LLC
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: Mommie Dearest: What's Gender Bias Got to Do With It?
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
TV Channel Bundling, Advertising Inserts and Drugs | Top |
In his Antitrust column, Cahill Gordon & Reindel partner Elai Katz reviews a Ninth Circuit decision that that consumers challenging the sale of cable and satellite television channels in bundled, multi-channel packages rather than individually did not state an antitrust claim, a Third Circuit ruling that a hospital could not bring tying claims against a drug-maker because the hospital bought the pharmaceuticals from an independent wholesaler, and more. | |
Juveniles And 'Miranda' Warnings | Top |
Andrew Schepard, professor of law and director of the Center for Children, Families and the Law at Hofstra Law School, summarizes the facts and opinions in 'J.D.B. v. North Carolina,' where the U.S. Supreme Court held that police must take a suspect's age into account in evaluating whether to give 'Miranda' warnings before questioning begins and speculates about its impact on constitutional protections for juvenile defendants. | |
Albany: Murder Conviction That Was Based on Circumstantial Evidence Upheld | Top |
Panel Finds Suit Should Be Heard by School's Chief, Not the Court | Top |
Davis Polk Pro Bono Counsel Nominated for Federal Bench | Top |
Trustee Says Almost Half of Madoff Losses Recovered | Top |
Judge Sides With Marvel in 'Spider-Man' Dispute | Top |
Defendant Not Persistent Felony Offender, Judge Says | Top |
Judge Finds It 'Entirely Plausible' Lehman's Officers Misled Investors, Permits Class Action to Proceed | Top |
Q&A: Janet DiFiore | Top |
Emotions Run High in Town Hall Meeting to Explain 9/11 Fund | Top |
Wesley v. Smith-Lasofsky | Top |
Parties Granted Dissolution of Same-Sex Civil Union; Defendant Has No Obligation to Child | |
Matter of City of New York v. Bd. of Collective Bargaining of City of New York | Top |
As Prevailing Party, Union Is Granted Costs But Loses Bid for Sanctions Against City, DOT | |
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. NY Central Mut. Fire Ins. Co. | Top |
Motion to Strike Answer Denied; Preclusion Order Granted Unless Documents Disclosed | |
Breytman v. Schechter | Top |
Attorney's Fee, Personal Sanctions Directed Against Client for Frivolous Conduct | |
People v. DiPretoro | Top |
Accusatory Instrument Facially Insufficient, Fails to Corroborate Element of DUI Charge | |
People v. Smith | Top |
'Substantial Pain' May Be Inferred Without Testimony; Dismissal of Assault Charge Denied | |
Kennedy v. New York Presbyterian Hospital | Top |
Plaintiff Cannot Show Malpractice Without Expert Testimony | |
Lawson v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services | Top |
Petitioner Paid His Debt to Society After Killing Wife, and Will Be Naturalized | |
Stephens-Buie v. Shinseki | Top |
Plaintiff Permitted to Amend Complaint To Give Dates of Retaliatory Harassment | |
Sommersett v. City of New York | Top |
Federal Disparate Treatment Claims Fail, But Survive Under State Law | |
Salazar v. Bowne Realty Associates LLC | Top |
Plaintiff Can Amend Complaint To Add Additional Retaliation Claims | |
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
Outside Counsel: Mommie Dearest: What's Gender Bias Got to Do With It? | Top |
Robert Z. Dobrish, senior partner at Dobrish Zeif Gross, writes that in matrimonial cases, the perception of gender bias runs high particularly among litigants, with unsuccessful fathers claiming that mothers receive preferential treatment. While the complaint may often sound like sour grapes, there is evidence indicating that bias exists among those who are called upon to assist in making custody determinations. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment