The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Supreme Court on Securities Law: Conflicting Attitudes on Class Actions
- New Disclosure Requirements Not as Tough as Other States'
- Court Supports Copyright Penalty Against Student Who Peddled Textbooks Manufactured Overseas
- NYCLA Report Charts Effect of Budget Cuts on Courts
- Suffolk Officials Seek Court Help to Curb Gang Activity
- Defunct Heller Ehrman Set To Pay Unsecured Creditors
- Judge Rejects Rajaratnam's Request to Reverse Verdict
- Designer of Red Outsoles Plans Appeal of Ruling
- Edwards Angell Set for Fall Merger With Wildman Harrold
- JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Luxor Capital LLC
- K.G.K. Diamonds LLC v. Slane & Slane Designs LLC
- Nassau Beekman LLC v. Ann/Nassau Realty LLC
- Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
- MPEG LA LLC v. Audiovox Electronics Corp.
- Rosley v. Allyn
- Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of America
- In re September 11 Litigation
- Natural Resources Defense Council Inc v. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
- Silva v. Bridgebar LLC
- Ancile Investment Co. Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.
- Outside Counsel: Proposed Rule 2019 Amendment: Will It Stop the Games?
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Supreme Court on Securities Law: Conflicting Attitudes on Class Actions | Top |
In her Securities Regulation column, Roberta S. Karmel, Centennial Professor of Law and co-director of the Dennis J. Block Center for the Study of International Business Law at Brooklyn Law School, writes: Although one of the securities law cases decided by the Supreme Court this term exhibits a strong animus toward Rule 10b-5 class action cases, two others endorse and extend the holding of Basic Inc. v. Levinson, a case that did not command more than a plurality for its then controversial fraud-on-the-market theory for a presumption of reliance. | |
New Disclosure Requirements Not as Tough as Other States' | Top |
Court Supports Copyright Penalty Against Student Who Peddled Textbooks Manufactured Overseas | Top |
NYCLA Report Charts Effect of Budget Cuts on Courts | Top |
Suffolk Officials Seek Court Help to Curb Gang Activity | Top |
Defunct Heller Ehrman Set To Pay Unsecured Creditors | Top |
Judge Rejects Rajaratnam's Request to Reverse Verdict | Top |
Designer of Red Outsoles Plans Appeal of Ruling | Top |
Edwards Angell Set for Fall Merger With Wildman Harrold | Top |
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Luxor Capital LLC | Top |
Chase Fails to Show Credit Agreement Allowed Use of Tiered Distribution Method | |
K.G.K. Diamonds LLC v. Slane & Slane Designs LLC | Top |
Court Rejects Dismissal of Contract Breach, Account Stated Claims Against Diamond Dealer | |
Nassau Beekman LLC v. Ann/Nassau Realty LLC | Top |
Seller Granted Dismissal of Complaint, Denied Judgment on Counterclaim | |
Rosenthal v. Rosenthal | Top |
Subpoena to Compel Mediator to Testify Pursuant to Mediation Agreement Is Quashed | |
MPEG LA LLC v. Audiovox Electronics Corp. | Top |
Patent Exhaustion Doctrine Not a Defense To License Agreement in Contract Breach Suit | |
Rosley v. Allyn | Top |
Equitable Claims Not Allowed in Small Claims Part; Action Is Dismissed Without Prejudice | |
Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of America | Top |
Federal Employee's Conduct at Drug Testing Collection Site Constitutes a 'Refusal to Test' | |
In re September 11 Litigation | Top |
Firm Damaged on 9/11 Must Pay Ex-Counsel 33.3 Percent of Recovery | |
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc v. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | Top |
Air Force Defendants Adequately Searched For Records in Response to NRDC Request | |
Silva v. Bridgebar LLC | Top |
Default Arose from Defendant's Difficult Circumstances, Confusion Not Willful | |
Ancile Investment Co. Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co. | Top |
Defendant Is Not Estopped from Asserting The Exact Opposite of Previous Argument | |
Outside Counsel: Proposed Rule 2019 Amendment: Will It Stop the Games? | Top |
Schuyler Carroll, a partner at Perkins Coie, and Shan Haider, an associate at the firm, write that while the general intent of the proposed amendment is to "expand the scope of the rule's coverage and the content of its disclosure requirements," it also attempts to temper the ability to use 2019 as a strategic tool to gain leverage. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment