The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Direct Interest and Impact: Key Limitations on Notice of Pendency
- Circuit Reinstates Award, Finding Jail Was on Notice of Rape Danger
- Barbados Picks Veteran Long Island Court Attorney as Chief Justice
- Judge Upholds Indictment Against Union Over Aggressive Tactics
- Exclusions From Trial Overturn Conviction
- Judge Dismisses Challenge to LEED Certification
- Bank Opposes State Role in Review of Settlement
- Circuit Seeks Comment on Foschio Reappointment
- Personal Notes on Lawyers
- Judge Calls Deputy's Harassment of Neighbor 'Atrocious Conduct'
- Study: Only 1 in 5 Medical Malpractice Cases Pay
- First Game Publisher Network Inc. v. Afonin
- BW Sportswear Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
- Restrepo v. Yonkers Racing Corp. Inc.
- Downey Savings & Loan Assoc. FA v. Trujillo
- People v. D.J.H.
- Matter of Estate of Lillian Hill
- Stiles v. HarperCollins Publishers LLC
- Neverson-Young v. BlackRock Inc.
- Butto v. Collecto Inc.
- Tropp v. Conair Corp.
- JEDA Capital-Lenox LLC v. Comm'r, Internal Revenue Svce
- Outside Counsel: The Gay Divorcé: New York Will Have Many. Now What?
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| Direct Interest and Impact: Key Limitations on Notice of Pendency | Top |
| In their Commercial Division Update, Chadbourne & Parke partners George Bundy Smith and Thomas J. Hall discuss three recent cases which highlight critical judicial limitations on what constitutes a controversy impacting an interest in real property such as to make a notice of pendency proper, and situations which a notice of pendency may be used, and how careful pleading of the complaint might avoid them. | |
| Circuit Reinstates Award, Finding Jail Was on Notice of Rape Danger | Top |
| Barbados Picks Veteran Long Island Court Attorney as Chief Justice | Top |
| Judge Upholds Indictment Against Union Over Aggressive Tactics | Top |
| Exclusions From Trial Overturn Conviction | Top |
| Judge Dismisses Challenge to LEED Certification | Top |
| Bank Opposes State Role in Review of Settlement | Top |
| Circuit Seeks Comment on Foschio Reappointment | Top |
| Personal Notes on Lawyers | Top |
| Judge Calls Deputy's Harassment of Neighbor 'Atrocious Conduct' | Top |
| Study: Only 1 in 5 Medical Malpractice Cases Pay | Top |
| First Game Publisher Network Inc. v. Afonin | Top |
| Internet Game Publisher States Claim For Breach of Confidentiality Agreement | |
| BW Sportswear Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London | Top |
| Fact Issue Remains as to Whether Retailer Intentionally Inflated Merchandise Value | |
| Restrepo v. Yonkers Racing Corp. Inc. | Top |
| Injured Worker Fails to Show That Falling Through Hatch Door Was a Foreseeable Risk | |
| Downey Savings & Loan Assoc. FA v. Trujillo | Top |
| Counsel's Affirmation of Contacting Defunct Institution's Officer Leads to Sanctions Hearing | |
| People v. D.J.H. | Top |
| Court Finds Defendant, in Custody Since 2006 Without Being Convicted, is Fit to Stand Trial | |
| Matter of Estate of Lillian Hill | Top |
| Claim for Turnover From Bank Of Proceeds From Decedent's Bank Accounts Dismissed | |
| Stiles v. HarperCollins Publishers LLC | Top |
| Books Describing Tree House Construction Not Substantially Similar; No Infringement | |
| Neverson-Young v. BlackRock Inc. | Top |
| Negligent Failure to Preserve Evidence Do Not Warrant Dismissal, Adverse Inference | |
| Butto v. Collecto Inc. | Top |
| Collection Firm Loses Bid to Compel Arbitration Pursuant to Agreement It Was Not Party To | |
| Tropp v. Conair Corp. | Top |
| Patent Infringement Action Estopped By Findings, Holding in Prior Lawsuit | |
| JEDA Capital-Lenox LLC v. Comm'r, Internal Revenue Svce | Top |
| Declaratory Judgment Act Precludes Firm's Alter-Ego Claims Against IRS Commissioner | |
| Outside Counsel: The Gay Divorcé: New York Will Have Many. Now What? | Top |
| Eric I. Wrubel, a partner at McLaughlin & Stern, focuses on specific federal tax advantages which are unavailable to legally married same-sex couples who subsequently divorce, advantages that are unavailable solely due to the couple's sexual orientation. As a result, he says, until DOMA is repealed, practitioners must continue to utilize the remedies previously developed for the dissolution of same-sex relationships. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment