The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Depositions: An Important Tool for Trial
- Attempt to Block Landmark's Remodeling May Go Forward
- Judge Nullifies Rules for Testing Harness Race Horses for Drugs
- 2 Defendants Seeking Drug Law Resentencing Get Second Chance
- Prosecutors Seek to Dismiss Strauss-Kahn Charges
- City Bar Approves Four Civil Court Candidates
- Apple Sues Stores in Trademark Dispute
- Albany: Inmate's Victim Gets First Call on His Excessive-Force Award From State
- Obituary: Matthew S. Fenster
- Group Health Solutions Inc. v. Smith
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Northshore Power Systems LLC
- People v. Bahamadou
- Obstfeld v. Thermo Niton Analyzers LLC
- Matter of E.J. v. S.Y.
- Genovese Drug Stores Inc. v. Treeco Centers Ltd. Partnership
- Triomphe Partners Inc. v. Realogy Corp.
- Life Technologies Corp. v. AB Sciex Pte. Ltd.
- Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. v. Bethany Holdings Group LLC
- Reyes v. Reyes
- Steuben Foods Inc. v. Shibuya Hoppman Corp.
- Outside Counsel: Just Warming Up: Climate Litigation and Regulation of Greenhouse Gases
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| Depositions: An Important Tool for Trial | Top |
| In their Trial Advocacy column, Ben Rubinowitz, a partner at Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom & Rubinowitz, and Evan Torgan, a member of Torgan & Cooper, discuss balancing leading questions with open-ended ones, questioning witnesses who may not be available at trial, videotaping, using errata sheets to cast doubt, and more deposition rules and tactics that are pivotal to building a successful case. | |
| Attempt to Block Landmark's Remodeling May Go Forward | Top |
| Judge Nullifies Rules for Testing Harness Race Horses for Drugs | Top |
| 2 Defendants Seeking Drug Law Resentencing Get Second Chance | Top |
| Prosecutors Seek to Dismiss Strauss-Kahn Charges | Top |
| City Bar Approves Four Civil Court Candidates | Top |
| Apple Sues Stores in Trademark Dispute | Top |
| Apple has filed a trademark infringement complaint against two Flushing, Queens-based stores, Apple Story and Fun Zone, and the stores' owner, alleging the stores sold an assortment of counterfeit iPhone, iPod and iPad cases and stereo headsets bearing Apple trademarks. | |
| Albany: Inmate's Victim Gets First Call on His Excessive-Force Award From State | Top |
| Obituary: Matthew S. Fenster | Top |
| Group Health Solutions Inc. v. Smith | Top |
| Interest in Protecting Goodwill Is Legitimate Basis to Enforce Non-Compete Covenant | |
| Honeywell International Inc. v. Northshore Power Systems LLC | Top |
| Agreement in Force Before Termination Gives Rise to Damages to Royalty Payment | |
| People v. Bahamadou | Top |
| Criminal Defendant Subject to Removal Not Prejudiced by Ineffective Counsel | |
| Obstfeld v. Thermo Niton Analyzers LLC | Top |
| Corporation Alleging Contract was Void Fails to Allege That It is In Proctected Class | |
| Matter of E.J. v. S.Y. | Top |
| Parallel Custody Granted to Parents Who Are Unable to Arrive at Decisions Jointly | |
| Genovese Drug Stores Inc. v. Treeco Centers Ltd. Partnership | Top |
| Fact Issue Exists Whether Due Diligence Uncovered Landlord's Improper Calculations | |
| Triomphe Partners Inc. v. Realogy Corp. | Top |
| Petition to Vacate Award Untimely; Decision to Sustain Objections Within Panel's Discretion | |
| Life Technologies Corp. v. AB Sciex Pte. Ltd. | Top |
| Exploitation of Prior Agreement's Benefits Estops Firm From Avoiding Arbitration | |
| Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. v. Bethany Holdings Group LLC | Top |
| Jury Trial Right Waiver Knowingly, Voluntarily Contracted For Within Loans' Guarantees | |
| Reyes v. Reyes | Top |
| Former Spouse Protection Law Does Not Provide Jurisdiction Over Military Pension's Distribution | |
| Steuben Foods Inc. v. Shibuya Hoppman Corp. | Top |
| Alleged Infringer Projected Itself Into State; Stay Would Not Simplify Issues in Litigation | |
| Outside Counsel: Just Warming Up: Climate Litigation and Regulation of Greenhouse Gases | Top |
| Stanley N. Alpert, a partner at Constantine Cannon, writes: Given changed legal circumstances since the states, city and trusts filed suit, the Supreme Court's ruling in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut is no surprise, and emitters of GHGs should understand that the decision does not interrupt the steady progress toward regulating carbon and other GHGs in the United States. Major corporations recognize that GHG regulation is a fact of life, and the new decision is consistent with just that, despite the loss to the plaintiffs. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment