The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Depositions: An Important Tool for Trial
- Attempt to Block Landmark's Remodeling May Go Forward
- Judge Nullifies Rules for Testing Harness Race Horses for Drugs
- 2 Defendants Seeking Drug Law Resentencing Get Second Chance
- Prosecutors Seek to Dismiss Strauss-Kahn Charges
- City Bar Approves Four Civil Court Candidates
- Apple Sues Stores in Trademark Dispute
- Albany: Inmate's Victim Gets First Call on His Excessive-Force Award From State
- Obituary: Matthew S. Fenster
- Matter of Murphy v. Kirkland
- Glynn v. 177 W. 26th St. Realty Corp.
- Bey v. City of New York
- Cypress Court Associates v. McLauren
- Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP v. Henry
- Green Acres Mall LLC v. Sevenfold Enterprises LLC
- Skurka v. Alkoulily
- City of New York v. Group Health Inc.
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lines
- United States v. Blake
- Brown v. Fischer
- Outside Counsel: Just Warming Up: Climate Litigation and Regulation of Greenhouse Gases
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| Depositions: An Important Tool for Trial | Top |
| In their Trial Advocacy column, Ben Rubinowitz, a partner at Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom & Rubinowitz, and Evan Torgan, a member of Torgan & Cooper, discuss balancing leading questions with open-ended ones, questioning witnesses who may not be available at trial, videotaping, using errata sheets to cast doubt, and more deposition rules and tactics that are pivotal to building a successful case. | |
| Attempt to Block Landmark's Remodeling May Go Forward | Top |
| Judge Nullifies Rules for Testing Harness Race Horses for Drugs | Top |
| 2 Defendants Seeking Drug Law Resentencing Get Second Chance | Top |
| Prosecutors Seek to Dismiss Strauss-Kahn Charges | Top |
| City Bar Approves Four Civil Court Candidates | Top |
| Apple Sues Stores in Trademark Dispute | Top |
| Apple has filed a trademark infringement complaint against two Flushing, Queens-based stores, Apple Story and Fun Zone, and the stores' owner, alleging the stores sold an assortment of counterfeit iPhone, iPod and iPad cases and stereo headsets bearing Apple trademarks. | |
| Albany: Inmate's Victim Gets First Call on His Excessive-Force Award From State | Top |
| Obituary: Matthew S. Fenster | Top |
| Matter of Murphy v. Kirkland | Top |
| Panel Finds it Unfair to Join Firm's President As Respondent After Sex Bias Suit Filed | |
| Glynn v. 177 W. 26th St. Realty Corp. | Top |
| Owners Found Entitled to Ejectment Order For Eight of Nine Rent-Regulated Lofts | |
| Bey v. City of New York | Top |
| Rather than Dismissing Action, Civil Court Transfers Proceeding to Supreme Court | |
| Cypress Court Associates v. McLauren | Top |
| Owner's Rent Demand Defective; Stipulation Vacated and Petition for Arrears Dismissed | |
| Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP v. Henry | Top |
| Co-Owner Denied Motion to Be Substituted As Mortgagor in Foreclosure Action | |
| Green Acres Mall LLC v. Sevenfold Enterprises LLC | Top |
| Merger Clauses Prevent Application of Oral Agreement; Owner Granted Possession | |
| Skurka v. Alkoulily | Top |
| Court Finds Tenant Entitled To Return of Security Deposit | |
| City of New York v. Group Health Inc. | Top |
| New York's Definition of 'Relevant Market' For Health Insurance Found Legally Deficient | |
| Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lines | Top |
| Disgorgement, Civil Penalties Endorsed For Similar Stock Fraud Schemes | |
| United States v. Blake | Top |
| 'Skilling' Ruled Not New Evidence Warranting Retrial in Divorce, Death Benefits Fraud Case | |
| Brown v. Fischer | Top |
| Inmate's Work Release Status Not Revoked By Temporary Entry Into Relapse Program | |
| Outside Counsel: Just Warming Up: Climate Litigation and Regulation of Greenhouse Gases | Top |
| Stanley N. Alpert, a partner at Constantine Cannon, writes: Given changed legal circumstances since the states, city and trusts filed suit, the Supreme Court's ruling in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut is no surprise, and emitters of GHGs should understand that the decision does not interrupt the steady progress toward regulating carbon and other GHGs in the United States. Major corporations recognize that GHG regulation is a fact of life, and the new decision is consistent with just that, despite the loss to the plaintiffs. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment