The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Practical Responses to the New French Arbitration Law
- Jail Inmate Cannot Claim Privilege for Recorded Call
- Authors of Online Comments May Remain Anonymous, Judge Finds
- Despite U.S. Role, Environmental Lawsuit Is Shifted to State Court
- Irene Disrupts Courts, Mostly Located Upstate
- State Officials Ruled Immune From Post-Release Action
- Objectors to BofA Settlement Remove Case to Federal Court
- Clarification
- Slade v. Newman
- QBE Ins. Corp. v. Jinx-Proof Inc.
- Sovereign Bank v. American Elite Properties Inc.
- Rodriguez v. Allstate Ins. Co.
- Kopel v. Nassau County Bd. of Elections
- Matter of Rossetti v. Lopez
- United States v. Coke
- Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. Hernandez
- Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v. Estate of Rose Eisinger
- Ayco Co. L.P. v. Becker
- Amatangelo v. National Grid USA Service Co. Inc.
- Outside Counsel: Supreme Court Holds Federal Law Preempts State Failure to Warn Claims
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Practical Responses to the New French Arbitration Law | Top |
In their Arbitration column, Samuel Estreicher and Steven C. Bennett of Jones Day review the new law, which lessens the formalism surrounding arbitration, expressly provides for the confidentiality of domestic arbitrations but reverses the presumption of confidentiality in international cases, clarifies the role of French courts in supervising arbitration, and promotes the recognition of arbitration awards. | |
Jail Inmate Cannot Claim Privilege for Recorded Call | Top |
Authors of Online Comments May Remain Anonymous, Judge Finds | Top |
By holding that the anonymous and allegedly defamatory comments left on a Rochester daily newspaper's website are matters of opinion rather than assertions of fact, Supreme Court Justice David Michael Barry did not reach a lingering question on the applicable standard for releasing the identity of an anonymous Internet publisher. Neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor the New York appellate courts have declared a controlling standard. | |
Despite U.S. Role, Environmental Lawsuit Is Shifted to State Court | Top |
Irene Disrupts Courts, Mostly Located Upstate | Top |
State Officials Ruled Immune From Post-Release Action | Top |
Objectors to BofA Settlement Remove Case to Federal Court | Top |
Clarification | Top |
Slade v. Newman | Top |
Loan Note Ruled Not Promissory Note, But Instrument for Payment of Money Only | |
QBE Ins. Corp. v. Jinx-Proof Inc. | Top |
Assault and Battery Exclusion Relieves Insurer From Duty to Defend, Indemnify | |
Sovereign Bank v. American Elite Properties Inc. | Top |
Release Found Not to Apply to Agreements; Liability Proven, But Not Damages | |
Rodriguez v. Allstate Ins. Co. | Top |
Foreseeable Consequential Damages Proceed, but Punitives Are Denied | |
Kopel v. Nassau County Bd. of Elections | Top |
Petition Found Invalid as No 'Wilson/Pakula' Certificate Was Filed, Vacancy Not Created | |
Matter of Rossetti v. Lopez | Top |
Board's Decision to Use Enrollment Published April 2011 Requiring 13 Signatures Upheld | |
United States v. Coke | Top |
Wiretap Evidence Denied Suppression As Obtained Contrary to Jamaican Law | |
Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. Hernandez | Top |
Florida Firm, Owner Denied Venue Transfer Of Insurer's Contract Breach Suit to Florida | |
Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v. Estate of Rose Eisinger | Top |
Austrian Pension Body's Unjust Enrichment, Fraud Suit Survives Jurisdictional Challenge | |
Ayco Co. L.P. v. Becker | Top |
Ambiguities Lead to Denial of Veil PiercingTo Arbitrate Breach, Trade Secret Theft Claims | |
Amatangelo v. National Grid USA Service Co. Inc. | Top |
Court Explains Dismissal of ERISA Breach Claims Over Post-Retirement Life Insurance Benefits | |
Outside Counsel: Supreme Court Holds Federal Law Preempts State Failure to Warn Claims | Top |
Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass partners John Parker and Paul Danner analyze the recent Supreme Court decision in Pliva Inc. v. Mensing, which, in leaving its 2009 holding in Wyeth v. Levine untouched, made the outcome of private lawsuits based on state failure to warn laws dependent on whether an individual was prescribed a generic or name-brand version of the same drug. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment