The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- 'Brady' Obligations: Codification and Clarification
- Duty of Loyalty to Former Clients
- Nassau Prosecutors Ask Judge to Revisit Allegations in Opinion
- Referee Says Prince Should Pay $4 Million to Perfume Manufacturer
- Despite Old Ruling, Chevron Cleared to Challenge Ecuadorean Courts
- Goldman Sachs to Stop Disputed Mortgage Practices
- Man Loses Bid to Evict Ex-Wife From Apartment
- New York Judge Hears Issues Raised by Hotel Contract Dispute in Hawaii
- 9/11-Related Calendar of Events
- Hillside Manor Rehabilitation & Extended Care Center LLC v. Dallu
- Matter of Adamczyk v. Mohr
- Mehta v. Chugh
- Moykher v. Mahoney Cohen & Co. PC
- State of New York v. Winkle
- Matter of Joanna K.
- Erchonia Corp. v. Bissoon
- Eatoni Ergonomics Inc. v. Research In Motion Corp.
- Cohalan v. Genie Industries Inc.
- Song v. 47 Old Country Inc.
- Spread Spectrum Screening LLC v. Eastman Kodak Co.
- Outside Counsel: Proposal to Amend Rule 11 Introduced in Congress
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| 'Brady' Obligations: Codification and Clarification | Top |
| In their White-Collar Crime column, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer members Elkan Abramowitz and Barry A. Bohrer write that although the DOJ has undertaken to handle prosecutorial misconduct related to non-disclosure internally, practitioners question whether the government properly can police itself with respect to such matters, and they advocate for substantive change. The latest attempt at external reform comes from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. | |
| Duty of Loyalty to Former Clients | Top |
| In his Professional Responsibility feature, Hinshaw & Culbertson partner Anthony E. Davis analyzes a recent California case, Oasis West Realty LLC v. Goldman, which has generated an extensive debate around the country because of its potentially broad implications for attorney-client relationship. | |
| Nassau Prosecutors Ask Judge to Revisit Allegations in Opinion | Top |
| Referee Says Prince Should Pay $4 Million to Perfume Manufacturer | Top |
| Despite Old Ruling, Chevron Cleared to Challenge Ecuadorean Courts | Top |
| Goldman Sachs to Stop Disputed Mortgage Practices | Top |
| Man Loses Bid to Evict Ex-Wife From Apartment | Top |
| New York Judge Hears Issues Raised by Hotel Contract Dispute in Hawaii | Top |
| 9/11-Related Calendar of Events | Top |
| Hillside Manor Rehabilitation & Extended Care Center LLC v. Dallu | Top |
| Order Modified Granting Partial Judgment On Claim Seeking to Recover Under DCL §273 | |
| Matter of Adamczyk v. Mohr | Top |
| Unanimous Panel Reverses Court's Order That Residency Requirement Unconstitutional | |
| Mehta v. Chugh | Top |
| Filing of Appeal Does not Stay Underlying Orders; Court Adheres to Original Decision | |
| Moykher v. Mahoney Cohen & Co. PC | Top |
| Employee Denied Reargument of Dismissal Of Age Discrimination Suit Found Untimely | |
| State of New York v. Winkle | Top |
| Firm Permitted to Withdraw for Clients' Failure to Pay Legal Fees for Over Two Years | |
| Matter of Joanna K. | Top |
| Waiver of Certification Requirement Of Prospective Adoptive Parents Denied | |
| Erchonia Corp. v. Bissoon | Top |
| Untimely, Inadequate Notice Did Not Allow Firm To Tailor Discovery, Defend Advertising Claim | |
| Eatoni Ergonomics Inc. v. Research In Motion Corp. | Top |
| Keyboard Maker Denied Reconsideration Of Arbitral Awards for 'BlackBerry' Maker | |
| Cohalan v. Genie Industries Inc. | Top |
| 'Similar Products' Discoverable in Liability Suit Even if Not Identical to Product At Issue | |
| Song v. 47 Old Country Inc. | Top |
| Likely Success on Wage Claims Shown, But Not Fraudulent Intent in Assets' Disposition | |
| Spread Spectrum Screening LLC v. Eastman Kodak Co. | Top |
| Infringement Suit Stayed Pending Patent's Re-Examination; Party May Seek Depositions | |
| Outside Counsel: Proposal to Amend Rule 11 Introduced in Congress | Top |
| Ann M. Odelson and Timothy B. Parlin of Carroll, McNulty & Kull discuss whether the amendment to Rule 11, which attempts to reduce frivolous lawsuits, will be enacted, and how without the serious threat of punishment for filing these lawsuits, innocent individuals and companies will continue to face the harsh economic reality that simply paying off frivolous claimants is often cheaper than litigating the case. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment