The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Lessons From Lago Agrio Environmental Pollution Case
- Heightened B-1 Visa Scrutiny Affects International Employers
- Hofstra Renames Law School for Contributor of $20 Million
- Pay: Citing Poor Pay, Court of Claims Judge Resigns
- Judge Rejects Bid to Take DNA for Possible Match With Guns
- Lippman to Resume His Push for Expanded Legal Services
- Court-System Lawyers Win Civil Court Primaries
- Former Integrity Head Joins Kirkland & Ellis
- Judge Dismisses Suit in the First Test of Dodd-Frank Retaliation Provisions
- Conference Instructs Federal Judges to Limit Sealing of Entire Cases
- Judge Signals Stiff Sentence for Boiler-Room Operator
- 9/11 Families Press Court to Obtain List of Kin
- Guaiana v. Langdale Owners Corp.
- Zevgolis v. Pericic
- Lahens v. Town of Hempstead
- Adams v. Imm
- Biamonte v. Savinetti
- DiLorenzo v. Felberbaum
- Burns v. Ercole
- Telebrands Corp. v. Del Laboratories Inc.
- Severin v. Project OHR Inc.
- Reach Music Publ. Inc. v. Warner/Chapell Music Inc.
- Woods v. Maytag Co.
- Outside Counsel: Counsel's Obligation to Advise a Defendant on the Right to Testify
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Lessons From Lago Agrio Environmental Pollution Case | Top |
In his International Environmental Law column, Stephen L. Kass, a partner at Carter Ledyard & Milburn, write that the final chapter of the protacted dispute between Ecuadorian residents and Chevron remains to be written, however, some important lessons are already emerging from the last dozen years of litigation in the United States, Ecuador and the Hague. | |
Heightened B-1 Visa Scrutiny Affects International Employers | Top |
In his Immigration Law column, Michael D. Patrick of Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy discusses how the government looks closely at the way U.S. and international employers use the B-1 visa program, examines the visa category and details how employers can maintain compliance with existing B-1 regulations. | |
Hofstra Renames Law School for Contributor of $20 Million | Top |
Pay: Citing Poor Pay, Court of Claims Judge Resigns | Top |
Judge Rejects Bid to Take DNA for Possible Match With Guns | Top |
Lippman to Resume His Push for Expanded Legal Services | Top |
Court-System Lawyers Win Civil Court Primaries | Top |
Former Integrity Head Joins Kirkland & Ellis | Top |
Judge Dismisses Suit in the First Test of Dodd-Frank Retaliation Provisions | Top |
Conference Instructs Federal Judges to Limit Sealing of Entire Cases | Top |
Judge Signals Stiff Sentence for Boiler-Room Operator | Top |
9/11 Families Press Court to Obtain List of Kin | Top |
Guaiana v. Langdale Owners Corp. | Top |
Hiring of Snow Remover Did Not Displace Owner's Duty to Maintain Premises Safely | |
Zevgolis v. Pericic | Top |
Lack of Jurisdiction Denies Judgment in Lieu Of Complaint; Arbitration Not Mandatory | |
Lahens v. Town of Hempstead | Top |
County Granted Summary Judgment On Liability in Negligence Action | |
Adams v. Imm | Top |
Association's Decision Finding Officer Guilty Of Not Complying With Bylaws Is Upheld | |
Biamonte v. Savinetti | Top |
Republican Commissioner Is Directed To Prepare, Administer Primary Elections | |
DiLorenzo v. Felberbaum | Top |
Passengers in One-Vehicle Crash Granted Partial Summary Judgment on Liability | |
Burns v. Ercole | Top |
Excluded Hearsay Statement Not Material Or Vital to Defense; Habeas Relief Denied | |
Telebrands Corp. v. Del Laboratories Inc. | Top |
Foot File's Functional Egg Shape Not Shown Essential or Affecting Cost, Quality | |
Severin v. Project OHR Inc. | Top |
FLSA Pay Claims' Arbitration Not Compelled; Bargaining Pact Lacked Clear Rights Waiver | |
Reach Music Publ. Inc. v. Warner/Chapell Music Inc. | Top |
Breach of Covenant Not to Sue Alleged But Not Breach by Copyright Interest's Transfer | |
Woods v. Maytag Co. | Top |
Court Explains Ruling Partly Dismissing Claims Arising From Gas Oven Explosion | |
Outside Counsel: Counsel's Obligation to Advise a Defendant on the Right to Testify | Top |
Mark M. Baker, of counsel to Brafman and Associates, briefly surveys the rights of the accused with regard to offering their own testimony and the obligation of defense counsel - as opposed to the court - to protect such rights, and the remedy for an aggrieved defendant who has not been properly advised that the ultimate decision is not counsel's to make. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment