Y! Alert: NYLJ.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from NYLJ.com

• Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
• A Year in Review: 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines
• Back to College: Still Covered?
• Conduct Panel Accuses Surrogate of Inaction in P.A. Counsel Scandal
• Juror's Failure to Disclose History Did Not Bias Tax Case, U.S. Argues
• Federal Court Settlement Targets Glitch in Electronic Vote Counting
• Judge Convicts Ex-Executive in Hospital Bribery Scheme
• Debevoise Adds Restructuring Partner From Kirkland
• In Rejecting Negligence Suit, Judge Finds That Golfing in the Rain Comes With Risks
• FDA Defends Graphic Labels Against Cigarette Makers' Suit
• Judge Allows Rider's Suit to Proceed Against Ranch
• In Re New York City Asbestos Litigation
• Matter of Mason v. City of New York
• Martinez v. 835 Ave. of the Americas LP
• Matter of Will of Stanley S. Lasdon
• International Shoppes Inc. v. Spencer
• Trusts and Estates
• Almonte v. Public Storage Inc.
• Soward v. Deutsche Bank AG
• Hill v. Donoghue
• Lufthansa Technik AG v. Astronics Corp.
• Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 264 and 375 v. Nason's Delivery Inc.
• Outside Counsel: Is Parking Lot Revenue for Tax-Exempt Organizations Business Income?

---

Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon	Top
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds
A Year in Review: 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines	Top
In their Antitrust Trade & Practice column, Neal R. Stoll and Shepard Goldfein, partners at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, write that there is no doubt that the parties to a transaction must be prepared to adhere to the ground rules contained in the 2010 Guidelines when presenting their case before the agencies. However, the agencies will still bear the burden of defining a relevant market if its challenge ends up in court.
Back to College: Still Covered?	Top
In their Insurance Law column, Norman H. Dachs and Jonathan A. Dachs, partners at Shayne, Dachs, Corker, Sauer & Dachs, write that it is clear that a child who attends school away from home or serves in the military can benefit from the coverage afforded by his or her parents' policy. And, indeed, they note, it should be noted that such coverage works both ways -- protection may also extend to parents who borrow an automobile that is registered and insured in a child's name, while that child is away at school or in the military.
Conduct Panel Accuses Surrogate of Inaction in P.A. Counsel Scandal	Top
Juror's Failure to Disclose History Did Not Bias Tax Case, U.S. Argues	Top
Federal Court Settlement Targets Glitch in Electronic Vote Counting	Top
Judge Convicts Ex-Executive in Hospital Bribery Scheme	Top
Debevoise Adds Restructuring Partner From Kirkland	Top
In Rejecting Negligence Suit, Judge Finds That Golfing in the Rain Comes With Risks	Top
FDA Defends Graphic Labels Against Cigarette Makers' Suit	Top
Judge Allows Rider's Suit to Proceed Against Ranch	Top
In Re New York City Asbestos Litigation	Top
Court Rules 'Ends of Justice' Served By Consolidated Trial in Asbestos Litigation
Matter of Mason v. City of New York	Top
Employee not Entitled to CSL §75 Hearing Post-Termination; HRA Granted Dismissal
Martinez v. 835 Ave. of the Americas LP	Top
Accident not Result From Fall From Height, Falling Object; Labor Law §240(1) Inapplicable
Matter of Will of Stanley S. Lasdon	Top
Objectants Granted Six Percent Interest Award on Surcharges Against Co-Trustee
International Shoppes Inc. v. Spencer	Top
Employers' Fraudulent Concealment Claims Dismissed; Defamation Suit Allowed to Proceed
Trusts and Estates	Top
Decedent Lacked Testamentary Capacity To Execute Propounded Will, Probate Denied
Almonte v. Public Storage Inc.	Top
Company Collecting Its Own Debt Is Creditor, Not Collection Agency, Under Debt Law
Soward v. Deutsche Bank AG	Top
State's 'Borrowing Statute' Renders BLIPS Fraud Suits Against Deutsche Bank Untimely
Hill v. Donoghue	Top
AUSA Not Immune From Wiretap Act Claim But Inmate Consented to Calls' Recording
Lufthansa Technik AG v. Astronics Corp.	Top
Suit for Discovery Aiding German Litigation Should Give Way to Lawsuit in Washington
Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 264 and 375 v. Nason's Delivery Inc.	Top
Union Denied Injunctive Relief Against Assets' Sale; Irreparable Harm, Success Not Shown
Outside Counsel: Is Parking Lot Revenue for Tax-Exempt Organizations Business Income?	Top
John P. Napoli, a partner at Seyfarth Shaw, writes that Congress, in the Revenue Act of 1950, first enacted the tax on the UBTI of certain tax-exempt organizations and stated in the accompanying House Report that: "[t]he term 'rents from real property,' does not include income from the operation of a hotel but does include rents derived from a lease of the hotel itself. Similarly, income derived from the operation of a parking lot is not considered 'rents from real property.'"

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions

You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.