The latest from NYLJ.com
- Soft Law Guides Parties on Procedures in International Arbitration
- Vapor Intrusion a Volatile Issue For Property Owners and Lenders
- New Circuit Disciplinary Rule Targets Uncooperative Attorneys
- Judge Says Congregational Vote on Posting of Bond Is Required
- City Agency Proper Forum to Air Radio Host Claims Against Agents
- News In Brief
- Federal Judge Certifies Class Action Against Starbucks Over Tip Policy
- Attorneys From Gibson Dunn Tally 9,000 Hours in Day Laborers' Cause
- Scacchi v. 1251 Americas Associates II LP
- Friedman v. Fenyn
- Matter of Frost v. Bak
- Matter of Dickinson v. NYS Unified Court System
- EMA Acupuncture PC v. Progressive Ins. Co.
- St. Vincent's Services Inc. v. Pitt
- Bodansky v. Fifth on the Park Condo LLC
- United States v. Young
- Marathon Projects Ltd. v. Creative Designs Int'l Ltd.
- Fagan v. U.S. Carpet Installation Inc.
- Emerson Enterprises LLC v. Kenneth Crosby New York LLC
- Outside Counsel: Stranger-Originated Life Insurance and Life Settlements After 'Kramer'
| Soft Law Guides Parties on Procedures in International Arbitration | Top |
| In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky, members of Baker & McKenzie, write that arbitration, compared to proceedings in courts, is almost free of procedural rules, leaving much to the parties and the arbitrators to determine how proceedings are conducted. In an effort to provide some guidance, a number of groups of experienced practitioners have published checklists, prescriptive statements and "best practices" that can benefit those planning for and managing arbitration proceedings. | |
| Vapor Intrusion a Volatile Issue For Property Owners and Lenders | Top |
| In her State Environmental Regulation column, Charlotte A. Biblow, a partner at Farrell Fritz, writes that both the New York State Department of Health and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation recently issued guidance documents on vapor intrusion. | |
| New Circuit Disciplinary Rule Targets Uncooperative Attorneys | Top |
| Judge Says Congregational Vote on Posting of Bond Is Required | Top |
| City Agency Proper Forum to Air Radio Host Claims Against Agents | Top |
| News In Brief | Top |
| Federal Judge Certifies Class Action Against Starbucks Over Tip Policy | Top |
| Attorneys From Gibson Dunn Tally 9,000 Hours in Day Laborers' Cause | Top |
| Scacchi v. 1251 Americas Associates II LP | Top |
| Court Finds Statute Does Not Apply To Open Area Where Laborer Fell | |
| Friedman v. Fenyn | Top |
| Ex-Wife Granted Dismissal of Ex-Husband's Attorney's Motion Seeking Recovery of Fees | |
| Matter of Frost v. Bak | Top |
| Court Denies Severance of Car Accident, Malpractice Claims. Consolidates Actions | |
| Matter of Dickinson v. NYS Unified Court System | Top |
| Issue of Substantial Evidence Supporting Termination Transferred to Appeals Court | |
| EMA Acupuncture PC v. Progressive Ins. Co. | Top |
| Insurer May Not Seek Renewal Of Motion Upon Which It Defaulted | |
| St. Vincent's Services Inc. v. Pitt | Top |
| Monthly Tenancy Reinstated by Acceptance, Retention of Rent After Holdover Commenced | |
| Bodansky v. Fifth on the Park Condo LLC | Top |
| Interstate Land Sales Act's 100-Lot Exemption Found Decided When 100 Units Are Sold | |
| United States v. Young | Top |
| Source's Information on Suspects, Gun Found to Provided Probable Cause for Search | |
| Marathon Projects Ltd. v. Creative Designs Int'l Ltd. | Top |
| Firm Stepped Into Predecessor's Shoes, Liable For Commissions Under Pacts to Same Extent | |
| Fagan v. U.S. Carpet Installation Inc. | Top |
| Bias Claimants Failed to Allege That Age Was Not 'But For' Cause of Terminations | |
| Emerson Enterprises LLC v. Kenneth Crosby New York LLC | Top |
| Site's Owner Found Not Liable for Clean-Up Of PCB Dumped in 'Dry Well' Before 1980 | |
| Outside Counsel: Stranger-Originated Life Insurance and Life Settlements After 'Kramer' | Top |
| Norman L. Tolle and Jay D. Kenigsberg, partners in Rivkin Radler, write that although some might have expected that the Court of Appeals in Kramer v. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. was opening the door to a Wild West-type unregulated life settlement market in this state, that has not been the result, likely due to the state's new STOLI laws. The life settlement market in New York is, however, likely to grow, although in a restrained manner and with the interests of policyholders better protected. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment