The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- In Defense of the Medical Indemnity Fund
- Criminal and Administrative Insurance Fraud Cases in the Courts
- Ex-Cravath Partner, Day Pitney Attorney Nominated for Bench
- Bias Case Remanded in Light of High Court's Reverse Discrimination Ruling
- Effort by Dog Groups to Win Favor Under Helmsley Trust Rejected
- News In Brief
- Pay: At Law Day in Brooklyn, Talk of Budget Cuts, Lack of Pay Raise
- Correction
- Matter of P.K. v. S.M.
- People v. Suya
- Matter of Soledad P.
- People v. Garcia
- Wendy B. v. Michael B.
- American States Ins. Co. v. Casado
- The Joester Loria Group v. The Licensing Co. Ltd.
- Kupfer v. Federal Republic of Germany
- United States v. King
- United States v. Kozeny
- Husain v. Smarte Carte Inc.
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: Confusion Persists Over Application of the 'Noseworthy' Doctrine
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
In Defense of the Medical Indemnity Fund | Top |
In their Medical Malpractice Defense column, John L.A. Lyddane and Barbara D. Goldberg, partners at Martin Clearwater & Bell, write that concerns over the new Fund, intended to provide funds to pay for the medical needs of children injured at birth, are probably not warranted: there is no reason to expect the administrator to enter the realm of medical decision-making, and it seems that health care providers will not be able to reject Fund assignments. | |
Criminal and Administrative Insurance Fraud Cases in the Courts | Top |
In his Insurance Fraud column, Rivkin Radler partner Evan H. Krinick writes: State and federal courts in New York have recently issued a number of significant decisions in cases involving allegations of insurance fraud. The results were decidedly mixed for the government. However, the fact that there have been so many important cases in the courts, together with at least one new major legislative development relating to criminal insurance fraud, suggests that insurance fraud may finally be gaining the attention it deserves in New York. | |
Ex-Cravath Partner, Day Pitney Attorney Nominated for Bench | Top |
Bias Case Remanded in Light of High Court's Reverse Discrimination Ruling | Top |
Effort by Dog Groups to Win Favor Under Helmsley Trust Rejected | Top |
News In Brief | Top |
Pay: At Law Day in Brooklyn, Talk of Budget Cuts, Lack of Pay Raise | Top |
Correction | Top |
Matter of P.K. v. S.M. | Top |
N.Y. Court Declines Jurisdiction in Custody Matter, Finds Texas Is Child's 'Home State' | |
People v. Suya | Top |
Defendant Convicted of Exclusion Offense Is Found Ineligible for Re-Sentencing | |
Matter of Soledad P. | Top |
Guardian Denied Application to Fix 'Legal Fees' on Top of Statutory Commissions Taken | |
People v. Garcia | Top |
Court Rules Exigency Situation Gave Rise To Warrantless Entry, Seizure of Evidence | |
Wendy B. v. Michael B. | Top |
Husband's Voluntary Retirement Appears Calculated to Reduce Support Obligation | |
American States Ins. Co. v. Casado | Top |
Lack of Evidence Collision Staged, Deliberate Denies Insurer Motion for Default Judgment | |
The Joester Loria Group v. The Licensing Co. Ltd. | Top |
Claim of Confidential Information's Theft In Bid for Jeep Licensing Agency Dismissed | |
Kupfer v. Federal Republic of Germany | Top |
Bearer Bonds' Holder Loses Recovery Effort; West German 'Validation Law' Not Satisfied | |
United States v. King | Top |
Embezzlement, Tax Evasion Charges Stand; Defendant's Status as ERISA Fiduciary Met | |
United States v. Kozeny | Top |
Restraining Order for Forfeiture of Proceeds Of Sale of Fugitive's Home Not Terminated | |
Husain v. Smarte Carte Inc. | Top |
NLRB Has Jurisdiction Over Claims of Bias, Retaliation Stemming From Union Activities | |
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
Outside Counsel: Confusion Persists Over Application of the 'Noseworthy' Doctrine | Top |
Paul S. Danner, a member of Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass, analyzes a recent decision which highlights many unsettled issues surrounding the application of the Noseworthy doctrine to amnesiac plaintiffs, including the distinction between a simple mistake as to the facts of the incident versus medically diagnosed amnesia, the practical definition of "impossible" and medical evidence required, and more. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment