The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Liability Under Labor Law §240(1) After 'Runner' Decision
- Antitrust Enforcers Target Hospital Consolidations
- Lenders Must 'Strictly Comply' With Foreclosure Notice Rules
- Tech Investor Loses Bid to Recoup $6.3 Million Lost in Dreier Scam
- Albany: Comptroller Asks Schneiderman to Join Public Corruption Probes
- Justice McGuire Set to Join Dechert
- News In Brief
- Justices Uphold Court Order Requiring Reduction in California Prison Population
- Comodore Factors Corp. v. Habib American Bank
- Castellano v. Seaport Park Condo.
- Matter of Perry v. 61 Jane St. Tenants Corp.
- Fung v. Holy Trinity Ukrainian Authocefalic Orthodox Church
- RCPI Landmark v. Chasm Lake Management Services LLC
- Kaplan v. Khan
- Word v. Lord
- Mori v. Saito
- Rodriguez v. Smith
- Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Insco Ltd.
- In re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litig.
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: Court of Appeals Endorses Robust In Pari Delicto Defense
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| Liability Under Labor Law §240(1) After 'Runner' Decision | Top |
| In their Trial Practice column, Robert S. Kelner, senior partner at Kelner & Kelner, and Gail S. Kelner, an attorney with the firm, analyze a widely cited 2009 Court of Appeals decision, notable for construing the Scaffold Law more expansively than some of the other relatively recent decisions of this Court. | |
| Antitrust Enforcers Target Hospital Consolidations | Top |
| In his Health Law column, Francis J. Serbaroli, a shareholder in Greenberg Traurig, writes that recent actions demonstrate that the FTC will try to stop hospital mergers even before there is any actual evidence that the merger will significantly lessen competition or result in higher costs. As importantly, the FTC will examine and if necessary force the breakup of hospital systems, no matter when they occurred, if the benefits promised at the time of the merger have not materialized. | |
| Lenders Must 'Strictly Comply' With Foreclosure Notice Rules | Top |
| Tech Investor Loses Bid to Recoup $6.3 Million Lost in Dreier Scam | Top |
| Albany: Comptroller Asks Schneiderman to Join Public Corruption Probes | Top |
| Justice McGuire Set to Join Dechert | Top |
| News In Brief | Top |
| Justices Uphold Court Order Requiring Reduction in California Prison Population | Top |
| Comodore Factors Corp. v. Habib American Bank | Top |
| Account Pledged as Collateral on Credit Line; Bank Has Superior Right Over Judgment | |
| Castellano v. Seaport Park Condo. | Top |
| Dismissal Is Precluded by Questions of Fact As to Who Is Liable for Plaintiff's Injuries | |
| Matter of Perry v. 61 Jane St. Tenants Corp. | Top |
| Board Properly Terminated Shareholder's Proprietary Lease in Interests of Co-op | |
| Fung v. Holy Trinity Ukrainian Authocefalic Orthodox Church | Top |
| Issues of Fact Preclude Summary Judgment To Landowners Regarding Strip of Land | |
| RCPI Landmark v. Chasm Lake Management Services LLC | Top |
| Landlord's Petition for Rent Not Previously Demanded Is Found Fatally Defective | |
| Kaplan v. Khan | Top |
| Pastor Granted Dismissal of Parishioner's Defamation Claim as Not Justiciable | |
| Word v. Lord | Top |
| Habeas Petition Improper Device to Test Post-Conviction Proceeding Shortcomings | |
| Mori v. Saito | Top |
| Counsel Did Not Breach Conduct Rule By Listening in on Late-Night Phone Call | |
| Rodriguez v. Smith | Top |
| Mens Rea Claim for Manslaughter 1 Did Not Permit Conviction for Lesser Offense Rejected | |
| Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Insco Ltd. | Top |
| Appointment of Replacement Arbitrator Would Frustrate Parties' Intent Under Pact | |
| In re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litig. | Top |
| Amended Shareholder Derivative Complaint Dismissed; Futility of Prior Demand Not Shown | |
| Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
| Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
| Outside Counsel: Court of Appeals Endorses Robust In Pari Delicto Defense | Top |
| Ethan D. Wohl, a member of Wohl & Fruchter, discusses the Court of Appeals' decision in Kirschner v. KPMG LLP, writing: By establishing a near per se rule of non-liability, without regard to the third party's intent, the benefit it derived, or level of assistance it provided, the majority rule seems unlikely to achieve the appropriate level of compensation or deterrence. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment