The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Tax Appeals Tribunal Imposes Steep Tax on N.J.-Domiciled Caregiver
- Sentencing on 'Illegal Re-Entry,' Restitution, Respondeat Superior
- Sex Offender Loses Bid to Upset State Civil Confinement Statute
- Panel Reverses Attempted Assault Conviction of Former NY1 Anchor
- No Conflict Seen in JPMorgan's Private, Public Functions With Sigma
- Terror: Lack of Standing Dooms Suit Over Gitmo Interrogations
- Judge Approves Discovery Order in Toyota Cases
- Personal Notes on Lawyers
- ABA's Stance of Law School Accreditation Transparency Fails to Satisfy U.S. Senator
- Q&A: Floyd Abrams
- People v. Stewart
- Matter of Harlem River Yard Ventures Inc. v. Harlem River Yard Ventures Inc.
- Ahmad v. Bivomi
- Coyle v. Lubliner
- People v. Bagby
- People v. Thomas
- United States v. Vilar
- United States v. Kim
- Caldwell v. Slip-N-Slide Records Inc.
- Whitehurst v. 230 Fifth Inc.
- Outside Counsel: ERISA 'Stock-Drop' Litigation in the Second Circuit
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| Tax Appeals Tribunal Imposes Steep Tax on N.J.-Domiciled Caregiver | Top |
| In his Elder Law column, Daniel G. Fish, a principal in Daniel G. Fish LLC, reviews a case involving a New Jersey resident who worked in New York and bought a house in Staten Island for his parents where he occasionally stayed to assist them. The decision declaring him a statutory resident and subject to New York income tax serves as a warning to non-residents who purchase homes in New York for their parents who are in poor health. | |
| Sentencing on 'Illegal Re-Entry,' Restitution, Respondeat Superior | Top |
| In their Eastern District Roundup, Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan of Schlam Stone & Dolan review recent decisions involving the consideration in an illegal entry sentencing of convictions that would be stale on the date of discovery but not when defendant entered the country, proof of loss causation in the government's request for restitution, age discrimination, and vicarious liability under respondeat superior for a private entity based on conduct of an employee acting as a certified peace officer. | |
| Sex Offender Loses Bid to Upset State Civil Confinement Statute | Top |
| Panel Reverses Attempted Assault Conviction of Former NY1 Anchor | Top |
| No Conflict Seen in JPMorgan's Private, Public Functions With Sigma | Top |
| Terror: Lack of Standing Dooms Suit Over Gitmo Interrogations | Top |
| Judge Approves Discovery Order in Toyota Cases | Top |
| Personal Notes on Lawyers | Top |
| ABA's Stance of Law School Accreditation Transparency Fails to Satisfy U.S. Senator | Top |
| Q&A: Floyd Abrams | Top |
| People v. Stewart | Top |
| Panel Reverses Disorderly Conduct, Obstruction Charges in Courthouse Case | |
| Matter of Harlem River Yard Ventures Inc. v. Harlem River Yard Ventures Inc. | Top |
| Minority Shareholder's 10 Shares Valued at Over $2 Million; Attorney's Fees, Costs Awarded | |
| Ahmad v. Bivomi | Top |
| Motion to Set Aside Verdict, Damages Award As Against Weight of Evidence Is Denied | |
| Coyle v. Lubliner | Top |
| Court Upholds Verdict as Liability, Causation Issues Found Not Inextricably Intertwined | |
| People v. Bagby | Top |
| Witnesses' Testimony Is Found Incredible; Suppression of Weapons, Statements Denied | |
| People v. Thomas | Top |
| Search and Seizure Found Reasonable; Suppression of Statements, Knife Denied | |
| United States v. Vilar | Top |
| Staying Adjudication of Direct Appeal Will Unfairly Impose Delay | |
| United States v. Kim | Top |
| Totality of Evidence Shows Knowledge That Prostitute Was Driven Across State Lines | |
| Caldwell v. Slip-N-Slide Records Inc. | Top |
| Internet Connection Is InsufficientTo Grant Non-Resident Forum Deference | |
| Top | |
| Sampling as A Discovery Mechanism Is Permitted in Collective Action Cases | |
| Whitehurst v. 230 Fifth Inc. | Top |
| Discrimination Claim ProceedsAgainst Upscale Restaurant | |
| Outside Counsel: ERISA 'Stock-Drop' Litigation in the Second Circuit | Top |
| Jeffrey Scott, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell, and Matthew Schwartz, an associate at the firm, provide background on ERISA "stock drop" litigation - i.e., cases in which members of an employer-sponsored retirement plan sue the employer and others for failing to remove the employer's stock as a plan investment option prior to a decline in its value - and also identify four key issues in a case pending before the Second Circuit. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment