The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Jury Rejection of Uncontradicted Expert Testimony
- Communications Involving Collection of Decedents' Debts
- Designer's Claim Rival's Red Soles Infringed Trademark Is Rejected
- State Negligence Ruled a Factor in Patient's Attempted Suicide
- U.S. Judge Finds No Constitutional Damages Claim in Bullying Case
- ABA Preparing Ethics Advice On Technology, Globalization
- Ex-Body Armor Executive Pleads Guilty to Tax Charges
- Claim of Prior Road Incident Is Excluded From Testimony
- Suits Accuse New York Law School, Thomas Cooley of Job Statistics Fraud
- Marshall Summer Internships Conclude
- Clarification
- Vig v. New York Hairspray Co. LP
- Chaine v. Paris Limousine Services Corp.
- Matter of Martinez v. Vengersky
- Suri v. Grey Global Group Inc.
- South Shore Adjustment Co. v. Pierre
- DiGeronimo v. Fuchs
- International Strategies Group Ltd. v. Ness
- Marzullo v. Beekman Campanile Inc.
- Ricks v. New Chrysler
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kelly Drye & Warren LLP
- Longacre Master Fund Ltd. v. ATS Automation Tooling Systems Inc.
- Outside Counsel: Narrowing the Applicability of Adverse Possession Amendments
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Jury Rejection of Uncontradicted Expert Testimony | Top |
In his Products Liability column, Michael Hoenig, a member of Herzfeld & Rubin, writes that venerable and recent case law suggests that uncontradicted, unimpeached, unrebutted expert testimony cannot simply be ignored despite the talismanic charge that the jury is the sole judge of a witness' credibility or the weight to be given to his or her testimony. | |
Communications Involving Collection of Decedents' Debts | Top |
In his Debtor-Creditor Law Wrap-Up, David M. Barshay of Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock and Neuwirth notes that with the dramatic decrease in the number of estates that actually go through formal probate, there is often no executor or administrator, and a debt collector is often unable to determine who has the authority to discuss and/or pay a decedent's debts. | |
Designer's Claim Rival's Red Soles Infringed Trademark Is Rejected | Top |
State Negligence Ruled a Factor in Patient's Attempted Suicide | Top |
U.S. Judge Finds No Constitutional Damages Claim in Bullying Case | Top |
ABA Preparing Ethics Advice On Technology, Globalization | Top |
Ex-Body Armor Executive Pleads Guilty to Tax Charges | Top |
Claim of Prior Road Incident Is Excluded From Testimony | Top |
Suits Accuse New York Law School, Thomas Cooley of Job Statistics Fraud | Top |
Marshall Summer Internships Conclude | Top |
Clarification | Top |
Vig v. New York Hairspray Co. LP | Top |
Actor's Employment Discrimination Claims Time-Barred by 3-Year Limitations Period | |
Chaine v. Paris Limousine Services Corp. | Top |
Limo Drivers Fail to Meet 'Superiority' Prerequisite for Class Action | |
Matter of Martinez v. Vengersky | Top |
Officer's Probationary Period Properly Extended and Termination Authorized | |
Suri v. Grey Global Group Inc. | Top |
Fired Employee's Discrimination Claims Fit Within Cognizable Legal Theory, not Vague | |
South Shore Adjustment Co. v. Pierre | Top |
Creditor's Complaint Is Doomed by FailureTo Prove Assignment, Notify Debtor | |
DiGeronimo v. Fuchs | Top |
Jehovah's Witness Loses Medical Malpractice Bid Against Doctor Over Blood Transfusion | |
International Strategies Group Ltd. v. Ness | Top |
Handwritten Fax Does Not Amount To Continuous Course of Conduct | |
Marzullo v. Beekman Campanile Inc. | Top |
Proof of Breach Ruled Necessary For Tortious Interference Contract Claim | |
Ricks v. New Chrysler | Top |
Lemon Law Claims Must Be Referred To Bankruptcy Court | |
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kelly Drye & Warren LLP | Top |
Employment Commission Files Suit Against Law Firm for Age Discrimination | |
Longacre Master Fund Ltd. v. ATS Automation Tooling Systems Inc. | Top |
Creditor's Claim Is Not Subject To Disallowance Under Omnibus Objection | |
Outside Counsel: Narrowing the Applicability of Adverse Possession Amendments | Top |
Joshua E. Kimerling, a partner at Cuddy & Feder, writes that, in an ironic twist, the reach of a law designed to protect property owners against claims by adverse possessors has the effect of protecting the property rights of the adverse possessors. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment