Y! Alert: NYLJ.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from NYLJ.com

• Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
• Danger of Rudimentary Economics: 'Safeway' Competitive Effects Analysis
• When a Lawyer Wants (Or Needs) Out
• Circuit Rules Police Sergeants Are Not Exempt From Overtime
• Pay: Panelists Support Salary Increase in Open Meeting on Judicial Pay
• Reversing Its Prior Ruling, Circuit Allows Statements Into Evidence
• SEC Drops Administrative Case Against Gupta
• No Violation of Federal Law Found in City's Project Pacts
• AIG Sues Bank of America for $10 Billion Over Mortgages
• Legal Sector Added 4,000 New Jobs Last Month
• Maid Sues Strauss-Kahn Over Hotel Encounter
• Personal Notes on Lawyers
• ABA Panel Addresses 'Crisis' in State Court Funding
• Sergeant Benevolent Association of New York City Inc. v. City of New York
• Goldberger & Dubin PC v. Hochfelder
• Warshefskie v. New York City Housing Authority
• Matter of Staten Island Physician Practice PC v. Carecore National Inc.
• Hughes v. Welsbach Electric Co.
• Matter of Hyatt
• Brod v. Omya Inc.
• United States v. Schlussel
• Smith v. CHF Industries Inc.
• Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida
• Kearney v. Kessler Family LLC
• Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
• Outside Counsel: Social Security Numbers: Nine Non-Discoverable Digits

---

Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon	Top
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds
Danger of Rudimentary Economics: 'Safeway' Competitive Effects Analysis	Top
In their Antitrust Trade and Practice column, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom partners Neal R. Stoll and Shepard Goldfein discuss a recent Ninth Circuit en banc opinion that reversed a panel's decision that had presumed that a temporary profit-sharing agreement among members of a multi-employer bargaining unit was anticompetitive without properly considering the visceral conditions spawning the agreement.
When a Lawyer Wants (Or Needs) Out	Top
In his Ethics and Criminal Practice column, Joel Cohen, a partner of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and an adjunct professor at Fordham Law School, writes: While fee disputes are often the reason why lawyers want out of a case, ethical considerations may come into play for a host of other problems that arise during the course of a representation. If the client is not prejudiced by a lawyer's intention to withdraw and the court has no objection, the "no harm, no foul" analysis will typically enable the withdrawing attorney to prevail.
Circuit Rules Police Sergeants Are Not Exempt From Overtime	Top
Pay: Panelists Support Salary Increase in Open Meeting on Judicial Pay	Top
Reversing Its Prior Ruling, Circuit Allows Statements Into Evidence	Top
SEC Drops Administrative Case Against Gupta	Top
No Violation of Federal Law Found in City's Project Pacts	Top
AIG Sues Bank of America for $10 Billion Over Mortgages	Top
Legal Sector Added 4,000 New Jobs Last Month	Top
Maid Sues Strauss-Kahn Over Hotel Encounter	Top
Personal Notes on Lawyers	Top
ABA Panel Addresses 'Crisis' in State Court Funding	Top
Sergeant Benevolent Association of New York City Inc. v. City of New York	Top
BCB's Decision SBA's Claimed Violation Of Past Practices not Arbitrable Upheld
Goldberger & Dubin PC v. Hochfelder	Top
Firm Does Not Have Standing to Sue for Disqualification as Clients Waived Conflict
Warshefskie v. New York City Housing Authority	Top
Injured Officer Wins Bid to Interpose New Theory in Suit Against City Agency
Matter of Staten Island Physician Practice PC v. Carecore National Inc.	Top
Medical Practice's Claims Found Not Cognizable Under Article 78
Hughes v. Welsbach Electric Co.	Top
Finding 'New' Evidence Is Not New, Court Denies Renewal, Reargument
Matter of Hyatt	Top
Common Interest Privilege Inapplicable, But Motion to Modify Subpoena Granted
Brod v. Omya Inc.	Top
Failure to Specify Contaminant In Notice of Intent to Sue Dooms Claim
United States v. Schlussel	Top
Government Cannot Be Forced to Reduce Sentence for Substantial Assistance
Smith v. CHF Industries Inc.	Top
Limited Partnership Is Substituted As Plaintiff in Infringement Suit
Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida	Top
Legal Fees Cannot Include Revenue Generated Separately From Judgment
Kearney v. Kessler Family LLC	Top
Friendly's, Its Franchisee Found Not to Share Identity of Interest
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority	Top
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience
Outside Counsel: Social Security Numbers: Nine Non-Discoverable Digits	Top
Jeffrey K. Levine, a Manhattan sole practitioner, writes: The federal government has made clear that providing an SSN is voluntary. So why do plaintiffs' counsel exchange such confidential digits and how will defense counsel use this confidential information? What are the consequences for not exchanging an SSN in the course of discovery? How should practitioners safeguard this information?

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions

You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.