The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Liability Under Labor Law §240(1) After 'Runner' Decision
- Antitrust Enforcers Target Hospital Consolidations
- Lenders Must 'Strictly Comply' With Foreclosure Notice Rules
- Tech Investor Loses Bid to Recoup $6.3 Million Lost in Dreier Scam
- Albany: Comptroller Asks Schneiderman to Join Public Corruption Probes
- Justice McGuire Set to Join Dechert
- News In Brief
- Justices Uphold Court Order Requiring Reduction in California Prison Population
- B.B. Jewels Inc. v. Neman Enterprises Inc.
- 432 W. 11th St. Corp. v. City of New York
- Broja Realty LLC v. Amparo
- Brown v. Mohammed
- Marle v. City of New York
- Militana v. DeMartino
- Newspaper Guild/CWA of Albany v. Hearst Corp.
- Emmet & Co. Inc. v. Catholic Health East
- Keeling v. New Rock Theater Productions LLC
- Wasserman Media Group LLC v. Bender
- Coca-Cola North America v. Crawley Juice Inc.
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: Court of Appeals Endorses Robust In Pari Delicto Defense
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| Liability Under Labor Law §240(1) After 'Runner' Decision | Top |
| In their Trial Practice column, Robert S. Kelner, senior partner at Kelner & Kelner, and Gail S. Kelner, an attorney with the firm, analyze a widely cited 2009 Court of Appeals decision, notable for construing the Scaffold Law more expansively than some of the other relatively recent decisions of this Court. | |
| Antitrust Enforcers Target Hospital Consolidations | Top |
| In his Health Law column, Francis J. Serbaroli, a shareholder in Greenberg Traurig, writes that recent actions demonstrate that the FTC will try to stop hospital mergers even before there is any actual evidence that the merger will significantly lessen competition or result in higher costs. As importantly, the FTC will examine and if necessary force the breakup of hospital systems, no matter when they occurred, if the benefits promised at the time of the merger have not materialized. | |
| Lenders Must 'Strictly Comply' With Foreclosure Notice Rules | Top |
| Tech Investor Loses Bid to Recoup $6.3 Million Lost in Dreier Scam | Top |
| Albany: Comptroller Asks Schneiderman to Join Public Corruption Probes | Top |
| Justice McGuire Set to Join Dechert | Top |
| News In Brief | Top |
| Justices Uphold Court Order Requiring Reduction in California Prison Population | Top |
| B.B. Jewels Inc. v. Neman Enterprises Inc. | Top |
| Principal Found Personally Liable For Corporate Debt on Dishonored Check | |
| 432 W. 11th St. Corp. v. City of New York | Top |
| City Granted Dismissal of Owner's Complaint Seeking Damages for Demolition of Building | |
| Broja Realty LLC v. Amparo | Top |
| Landlord Denied Late Fees for Laches, 'Shady' Practice of Two Sets of Books | |
| Brown v. Mohammed | Top |
| Mortgage Company Sufficiently States Claims for Malpractice, Conversion | |
| Marle v. City of New York | Top |
| LIRR Had No Duty to Provide Light On Public Street Under Train Trestle | |
| Militana v. DeMartino | Top |
| Corporation Found in Privity With Tenant; Principal Loses Bid to Vacate Judgment | |
| Newspaper Guild/CWA of Albany v. Hearst Corp. | Top |
| Circuit Concludes That Union Dues Checkoff Obligation Survived Bargaining Pact's Expiry | |
| Emmet & Co. Inc. v. Catholic Health East | Top |
| Bondholder Denied Relief Against Redemption; Irreparable Harm Not Shown | |
| Keeling v. New Rock Theater Productions LLC | Top |
| Script Parodying Film Eligible for Copyright Protection; Infringement Suit Goes Forward | |
| Wasserman Media Group LLC v. Bender | Top |
| Agent's $396,766 Award Against Former Basketball Pro Confirmed; Bad Faith Noted | |
| Coca-Cola North America v. Crawley Juice Inc. | Top |
| Distributors' Counterclaims Against Coke Dismissed in Suit for Funds Owed Under Pacts | |
| Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
| Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
| Outside Counsel: Court of Appeals Endorses Robust In Pari Delicto Defense | Top |
| Ethan D. Wohl, a member of Wohl & Fruchter, discusses the Court of Appeals' decision in Kirschner v. KPMG LLP, writing: By establishing a near per se rule of non-liability, without regard to the third party's intent, the benefit it derived, or level of assistance it provided, the majority rule seems unlikely to achieve the appropriate level of compensation or deterrence. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment