Y! Alert: NYLJ.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from NYLJ.com

• Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
• Beware: the Robinson-Patman Act Still Has Bite
• Revealing Your Client's 'Guilt' When He Sues You
• Whether Police Had Duty to Keep Woman Safe Is an Issue for Jury
• Parolee Moving to New York Has No Standing to Challenge Stricter Supervision, Circuit Rules
• Eagerness to Get Defendant 'Under Oath' Not Defamatory, Panel Says
• Pfau Orders Courts to Slash Jury Pools
• News In Brief
• City Plan to Turn Over Historic Brooklyn Structures to Developers Is Blocked
• Clarification
• Sherlock v. 20 E. 9th St. Owners Corp.
• Matter of Adler v. NYC Housing Authority
• Heywood Towers Associates v. Hussain
• Parkchester Preservation Co. LP v. Feldeine
• Dahari v. Libov
• H&H Realty LLC v. Wesley
• United States v. L&M 93rd Street LLC
• Burhans v. County of Putnam
• Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. City of New York
• Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. LLC v. Goldsmith
• Apex Maritime Co. Inc. v. Ohm Enterprises Inc.
• Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
• Outside Counsel: Are Insured's Legal Fees a Consequence of 'Bi-Economy' and 'Panasia'?

---

Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon	Top
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds
Beware: the Robinson-Patman Act Still Has Bite	Top
In their Antitrust Trade and Practice column, Neal R. Stoll and Shepard Goldfein, partners at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, write that although the Robinson-Patman Act has long been considered a stepchild of the antitrust laws, overshadowed by its more popular older siblings Sherman and Clayton, businesses, particularly sellers of goods, need to be aware of Robinson-Patman, not only as a potential tool, but also as a threat to consider when bringing suit against, or altering an arrangement with a customer.
Revealing Your Client's 'Guilt' When He Sues You	Top
In his Ethics and Criminal Practice column, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan's Joel Cohen, writes: You litigated your heart out for a client whom you relentlessly claimed to be innocent. But despite your Herculean efforts, the jury simply didn't buy the alibi so poignantly delivered at trial by his girlfriend. After two years in prison, for a variety of reasons largely arising from incorrect rulings by the trial judge, the client gains a reversal, and then decides to sue you for legal malpractice.
Whether Police Had Duty to Keep Woman Safe Is an Issue for Jury	Top
Parolee Moving to New York Has No Standing to Challenge Stricter Supervision, Circuit Rules	Top
Eagerness to Get Defendant 'Under Oath' Not Defamatory, Panel Says	Top
An attorney for a lender did not defame a defendant in a pending Long Island civil mortgage fraud case by commenting to a local newspaper that "I'm looking forward to getting him under oath," a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department has ruled.
Pfau Orders Courts to Slash Jury Pools	Top
News In Brief	Top
City Plan to Turn Over Historic Brooklyn Structures to Developers Is Blocked	Top
Clarification	Top
Sherlock v. 20 E. 9th St. Owners Corp.	Top
Co-op Did Not Create Nuisance or Retain Control of Apartment, Not Liable for Noise
Matter of Adler v. NYC Housing Authority	Top
Decision Denying Tenant of Record's Wife Remaining Family Status Is Upheld
Heywood Towers Associates v. Hussain	Top
Section 8 Tenant Not Liable for Full Amount Of Rent Even After Termination of Subsidy
Parkchester Preservation Co. LP v. Feldeine	Top
Stipulation, Judgment Entered Into by Lay Person On Tenant's Behalf Vacated
Dahari v. Libov	Top
Release Terminating Ex-Tenant's Obligations Under Lease Grants Him Dismissal of Claims
H&H Realty LLC v. Wesley	Top
Owner Granted Summary Judgment In Superintendent Holdover Proceeding
United States v. L&M 93rd Street LLC	Top
Intervention Denied to Real Estate Board For Failure to Show Interest in Bias Action
Burhans v. County of Putnam	Top
Court Dismisses Fired Public Health Nurse's First Amendment Retaliation Claim
Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. City of New York	Top
Listing of 'City of New York' as Additional Insured Does Not Cover All City Agencies
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. LLC v. Goldsmith	Top
Removal to Federal Court Satisfies Exception To Rule of Unanimity, Forum-Defendant Rule
Apex Maritime Co. Inc. v. Ohm Enterprises Inc.	Top
Shipping Company Fails to Adequately Allege Claim for Piercing Corporate Veil
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority	Top
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience
Outside Counsel: Are Insured's Legal Fees a Consequence of 'Bi-Economy' and 'Panasia'?	Top
Yale Glazer, a partner at Lazare Potter & Giacovas, writes that since the Court of Appeals in 2008 "changed the landscape" for consequential damages claims asserted against insurance companies, insureds are pointing to the courts's holdings in Bi-Economy and Panasia as a purported basis to demand another category of relief—the legal fees they incur in bringing their coverage lawsuits, even in the absence of any allegations of insurer bad faith.

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions

You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.