The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Demon or Savior?
- Supreme Court Rejects Bright-Line Materiality Test
- Albany: Children's Centers at Courts Are Hit Hard by Budget Cuts
- Father's Use of Facebook Did Not Violate Protective Order, Justice Says
- Suit by Man Blown Off Bicycle by Helicopter's Wake Goes Forward
- News In Brief
- Ex-Mob Boss Takes Stand Against One of His Own
- Clarification
- Sherlock v. 20 E. 9th St. Owners Corp.
- Matter of Adler v. NYC Housing Authority
- Heywood Towers Associates v. Hussain
- Parkchester Preservation Co. LP v. Feldeine
- Dahari v. Libov
- H&H Realty LLC v. Wesley
- United States v. L&M 93rd Street LLC
- Burhans v. County of Putnam
- Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. City of New York
- Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. LLC v. Goldsmith
- Apex Maritime Co. Inc. v. Ohm Enterprises Inc.
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: Mal(Content) Practice Cases: Disgruntled Litigants and Unpaid Fees
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Demon or Savior? | Top |
In his Domestic Banking column, Clyde Mitchell, adjunct professor of banking law at Fordham Law School, discusses the new, powerful regulator; its primary responsibilities and current status; the appointment of Elizabeth Warren as "unofficial czar" of the bureau; and the benefits and drawbacks of not appointing an official director. | |
Supreme Court Rejects Bright-Line Materiality Test | Top |
In their Corporate and Securities Litigation column, Sarah S. Gold and Richard L. Spinogatti of Proskauer Rose discuss how the Matrixx opinion reaffirms that materiality is dependent upon whether the fact omitted or misrepresented significantly altered the total mix of available information from the perspective of a reasonable investor. | |
Albany: Children's Centers at Courts Are Hit Hard by Budget Cuts | Top |
Father's Use of Facebook Did Not Violate Protective Order, Justice Says | Top |
A father did not commit either criminal contempt or stalking when he wrote disparagingly about the mother of his two children on Facebook, an upstate town justice has decided. According to the charges, Mr. Welte gained access in 2010 to Maureen L. Perry's Facebook account and began sending letters to friends and family on "Maureen's Friend List." Ms. Perry complained that the letters accused her of using the couple's children against Mr. Welte and of preventing him from seeing or communicating with them. | |
Suit by Man Blown Off Bicycle by Helicopter's Wake Goes Forward | Top |
News In Brief | Top |
Ex-Mob Boss Takes Stand Against One of His Own | Top |
Clarification | Top |
Sherlock v. 20 E. 9th St. Owners Corp. | Top |
Co-op Did Not Create Nuisance or Retain Control of Apartment, Not Liable for Noise | |
Matter of Adler v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Decision Denying Tenant of Record's Wife Remaining Family Status Is Upheld | |
Heywood Towers Associates v. Hussain | Top |
Section 8 Tenant Not Liable for Full Amount Of Rent Even After Termination of Subsidy | |
Parkchester Preservation Co. LP v. Feldeine | Top |
Stipulation, Judgment Entered Into by Lay Person On Tenant's Behalf Vacated | |
Dahari v. Libov | Top |
Release Terminating Ex-Tenant's Obligations Under Lease Grants Him Dismissal of Claims | |
H&H Realty LLC v. Wesley | Top |
Owner Granted Summary Judgment In Superintendent Holdover Proceeding | |
United States v. L&M 93rd Street LLC | Top |
Intervention Denied to Real Estate Board For Failure to Show Interest in Bias Action | |
Burhans v. County of Putnam | Top |
Court Dismisses Fired Public Health Nurse's First Amendment Retaliation Claim | |
Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. City of New York | Top |
Listing of 'City of New York' as Additional Insured Does Not Cover All City Agencies | |
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. LLC v. Goldsmith | Top |
Removal to Federal Court Satisfies Exception To Rule of Unanimity, Forum-Defendant Rule | |
Apex Maritime Co. Inc. v. Ohm Enterprises Inc. | Top |
Shipping Company Fails to Adequately Allege Claim for Piercing Corporate Veil | |
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
Outside Counsel: Mal(Content) Practice Cases: Disgruntled Litigants and Unpaid Fees | Top |
Robert Z. Dobrish, senior partner at Dobrish Zeif Gross, writes that the elephant in the room in all cases of an unhappy client and a lawyer owed money is the specter of a grievance or malpractice action, and a seasoned attorney can often smell a malpractice claim coming by the way the client speaks and writes. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment