Y! Alert: NYLJ.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from NYLJ.com

• Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
• Improper Solicitation, Post-Release Supervision, Stabilized Rent Increases
• Panel Finds Vendor Restrictions Do Not Violate Free Speech Rights
• Judge Blocks Use of Grand Jury Minutes in Civil Case
• Bar Groups Support Gay Marriage
• News In Brief
• Prosecutors Seek to Revive Conviction in Face of Police Lab Problems
• Judge in Strauss-Kahn Arraignment Has Handled Many High-Profile Cases
• Correction
• Saretsky v. 85 Kenmare Realty Corp.
• Villacorta v. Saks Inc.
• Moreta v. Cestero
• Only Properties LLC v. Beaven
• Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Turner
• Breland v. Abass
• South Shore Neurological Associates PC v. Ruskin Moscou Faltischek PC
• Centrifugal Force Inc. v. Softnet Communications Inc.
• Curto v. Medical World Communications Inc.
• Witkowski v. Adept Management Systems LLC
• PLC Trenching Co. LLC v. Newton
• Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
• Outside Counsel: Arbitrator Evident Partiality Standard Under Scrutiny in 'Scandinavian Re'

---

Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon	Top
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds
Improper Solicitation, Post-Release Supervision, Stabilized Rent Increases	Top
In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett partners Roy L. Reardon and Mary Elizabeth McGarry discuss: a decision arising out of the sale of a business in which the Court of Appeals provided some guidance on what constitutes improper solicitation by the seller of its former clients; a decision resolving six cases in which the sentencing court failed to impose post-release supervision during the initial sentencing hearing; and the Court's take on whether the New York City Rent Guidelines Board has the authority to promulgate orders allowing different rent increases for apartments based upon whether there had been a recent vacancy.
Panel Finds Vendor Restrictions Do Not Violate Free Speech Rights	Top
Judge Blocks Use of Grand Jury Minutes in Civil Case	Top
Bar Groups Support Gay Marriage	Top
News In Brief	Top
Prosecutors Seek to Revive Conviction in Face of Police Lab Problems	Top
Judge in Strauss-Kahn Arraignment Has Handled Many High-Profile Cases	Top
Correction	Top
Saretsky v. 85 Kenmare Realty Corp.	Top
Panel Finds Open, Obvious Hazard Is Not Fatal to Negligence Claim
Villacorta v. Saks Inc.	Top
Ex-Worker's Larceny Conviction Dismisses Slander, Malicious Prosecution Claims
Moreta v. Cestero	Top
Exhaustion Doctrine Bars Mother's Claims Against Agency, But Not Daughter's
Only Properties LLC v. Beaven	Top
Tenant's Dates of Treatment by Doctor Are Ruled 'Protected Information'
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Turner	Top
Failure to Name Necessary Party Dooms Bid to Recover Possession of Apartment
Breland v. Abass	Top
Landlord Failed to Correct Violations, Found In Contempt; Tenant Awarded Damages
South Shore Neurological Associates PC v. Ruskin Moscou Faltischek PC	Top
Law Firm Denied Dismissal of Client's Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims
Centrifugal Force Inc. v. Softnet Communications Inc.	Top
Court Explains Spoliation Sanctions' Denial In Software Copyright Infringement Action
Curto v. Medical World Communications Inc.	Top
Post-Ruling Actions as to Memos Waived Attorney-Client, Work Product Protections
Witkowski v. Adept Management Systems LLC	Top
Post-Termination Commission Entitlement Shown; Doubt Exists If Pact Post-Termination
PLC Trenching Co. LLC v. Newton	Top
Turncoat Worker, Competitor Restrained From Using Misappropriated Trade Secrets
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority	Top
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience
Outside Counsel: Arbitrator Evident Partiality Standard Under Scrutiny in 'Scandinavian Re'	Top
Philip J. Loree Jr., a partner at Loree & Loree, writes: The pending appeal in Scandinavian Reinsurance Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. presents the Second Circuit with the question of whether FAA Section 10(a)(2) authorized the district court to vacate an arbitration award because two of the arbitrators did not disclose to the parties facts about their involvement in an allegedly related proceeding. The answer should be "no."

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions

You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.