Y! Alert: NYLJ.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from NYLJ.com

• Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
• Improper Solicitation, Post-Release Supervision, Stabilized Rent Increases
• Panel Finds Vendor Restrictions Do Not Violate Free Speech Rights
• Judge Blocks Use of Grand Jury Minutes in Civil Case
• Bar Groups Support Gay Marriage
• News In Brief
• Prosecutors Seek to Revive Conviction in Face of Police Lab Problems
• Judge in Strauss-Kahn Arraignment Has Handled Many High-Profile Cases
• Correction
• Hoffman v. Biltmore 47 Associates LLC
• 1526 Central Ave. Associates v. NY Mortgage Co. LLC
• Matter of Gorelick v. NYC Dept. of Housing Preservation & Development
• Prestigiacomo v. Shorenstein Realty Services East LLC
• Trachman v. Ciorciari
• Calautti v. Grados
• In re Motors Liquidation Co.
• RFP LLC v. SCVNGR Inc.
• Schoolcraft v. City of New York
• Cacace v. Meyer Marketing (Macau Commercial Offshore) Co. LLC
• Applied Technology Inc. v. J.R. Clancy Inc.
• Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
• Outside Counsel: Arbitrator Evident Partiality Standard Under Scrutiny in 'Scandinavian Re'

---

Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon	Top
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds
Improper Solicitation, Post-Release Supervision, Stabilized Rent Increases	Top
In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett partners Roy L. Reardon and Mary Elizabeth McGarry discuss: a decision arising out of the sale of a business in which the Court of Appeals provided some guidance on what constitutes improper solicitation by the seller of its former clients; a decision resolving six cases in which the sentencing court failed to impose post-release supervision during the initial sentencing hearing; and the Court's take on whether the New York City Rent Guidelines Board has the authority to promulgate orders allowing different rent increases for apartments based upon whether there had been a recent vacancy.
Panel Finds Vendor Restrictions Do Not Violate Free Speech Rights	Top
Judge Blocks Use of Grand Jury Minutes in Civil Case	Top
Bar Groups Support Gay Marriage	Top
News In Brief	Top
Prosecutors Seek to Revive Conviction in Face of Police Lab Problems	Top
Judge in Strauss-Kahn Arraignment Has Handled Many High-Profile Cases	Top
Correction	Top
Hoffman v. Biltmore 47 Associates LLC	Top
Ex-Law Firm Not Discharged for Cause, Granted 40% Recoverable Attorney's Fees
1526 Central Ave. Associates v. NY Mortgage Co. LLC	Top
Plaintiff's Failure to Satisfy Conditions Precedent Grants Defendant Judgment
Matter of Gorelick v. NYC Dept. of Housing Preservation & Development	Top
Petitioner Ineligible for Mitchell-Lama Housing; Application Rejection Is Upheld
Prestigiacomo v. Shorenstein Realty Services East LLC	Top
WCL §11 Prohibits Indemnity, Contribution Claims Where Plaintiff's Injury Not 'Grave'
Trachman v. Ciorciari	Top
Plaintiff Granted Motion for Voluntary Discontinuance of Negligence Action
Calautti v. Grados	Top
Ex-Groom Entitled to Judgment, Recovery Of Value of Diamond Engagement Ring
In re Motors Liquidation Co.	Top
District Court Rejects California Auto Seller's Appeal to Reinstate Chevrolet Dealership
RFP LLC v. SCVNGR Inc.	Top
Tortious Interference Counterclaim Dismissed In Suit Between Competing Scavenger Hunts
Schoolcraft v. City of New York	Top
Involuntarily Detained Police Officer's §1983 Claims Against Hospital Is Dismissed
Cacace v. Meyer Marketing (Macau Commercial Offshore) Co. LLC	Top
Frying Pan's Rights Holders Lose Sanctions Bid for Licensees' Alleged Spoliation
Applied Technology Inc. v. J.R. Clancy Inc.	Top
Royalty Nonpayment Claim Dismissed to Extent Based on Sales After Agreement Terminated
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority	Top
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience
Outside Counsel: Arbitrator Evident Partiality Standard Under Scrutiny in 'Scandinavian Re'	Top
Philip J. Loree Jr., a partner at Loree & Loree, writes: The pending appeal in Scandinavian Reinsurance Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. presents the Second Circuit with the question of whether FAA Section 10(a)(2) authorized the district court to vacate an arbitration award because two of the arbitrators did not disclose to the parties facts about their involvement in an allegedly related proceeding. The answer should be "no."

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions

You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.