The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Unexecuted Settlement Agreements—Are They Enforceable?
- Court of Appeals Addresses Soliciting Business From Former Clients
- Panel Upholds Officials' Right to Block School Newspaper
- Granting Divorce, Judge Backs N.Y. Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages Contracted in Other States
- State Adopts Stricter Rules for LL.M. Programs for Foreign Students
- News In Brief
- Lawyers Ask Federal Judge to Find Iran Liable for 9/11
- Meet the New Bar Presidents: Long Island and Mid-Hudson Valley
- Jayne v. Talisman Energy USA Inc.
- DeSantis v. Zito
- Ramos v. 346 W. 17th St. LLC
- People v. Modesto
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Physical Medicine & Rehab of NY PC
- Berlly v. Gluck
- Nassau Anesthesia Associates PC v. Chin
- Burns v. Ercole
- Krantz & Berman LLP v. Dalal
- Clover v. Shiva Realty of Mulberry Inc.
- Tailored Lighting Inc. v. Osram Sylvania Products Inc.
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: Free Speech and the Impact of 'Snyder v. Phelps' on New York
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Unexecuted Settlement Agreements—Are They Enforceable? | Top |
In his Settlement and Compromise column, Thomas E.L. Dewey, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, writes: The question of when a settlement agreement creates enforceable obligations has, sadly but perhaps predictably, itself generated a significant amount of litigation. In particular, there are subtle but significant differences between the approach that New York state courts and New York federal courts have taken to these issues. | |
Court of Appeals Addresses Soliciting Business From Former Clients | Top |
In his Contract Law column, Glen Banks, a partner at Fulbright & Jaworski, discusses a recent ruling on when and how a voluntary seller of a business and its goodwill can interact with former clients, finding the seller could not initiate contact, disparage the sold firm nor tout his current business. | |
Panel Upholds Officials' Right to Block School Newspaper | Top |
Granting Divorce, Judge Backs N.Y. Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages Contracted in Other States | Top |
State Adopts Stricter Rules for LL.M. Programs for Foreign Students | Top |
News In Brief | Top |
Lawyers Ask Federal Judge to Find Iran Liable for 9/11 | Top |
Meet the New Bar Presidents: Long Island and Mid-Hudson Valley | Top |
Jayne v. Talisman Energy USA Inc. | Top |
Ratification Pact Not Lease Requiring Notice Mandated by §5-333(5) of Obligations Law | |
DeSantis v. Zito | Top |
Expert's Affidavit 'Highly Conclusory'; Movants Fail to Establish Entitlement to Judgment | |
Ramos v. 346 W. 17th St. LLC | Top |
Leave Is Granted to Amend Answer to Assert Cross-Claim for Contractual Indemnification | |
People v. Modesto | Top |
Defendant Ineligible to Have Conviction Conditionally Sealed Under CPL §160.58 | |
Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Physical Medicine & Rehab of NY PC | Top |
Florida Law Controls, Permits Retroactive Cancellation of Policy for Misrepresentation | |
Berlly v. Gluck | Top |
Nursing Staff Had No Authority to Overrule Physician's Orders; Complaint Dismissed | |
Nassau Anesthesia Associates PC v. Chin | Top |
Provider Fails to Establish Entitlement to Full Amount Claimed From Uninsured Patient | |
Burns v. Ercole | Top |
Unavailable Witness' Statement Not Material, Vital to Defense; Murderer Denied Habeas | |
Krantz & Berman LLP v. Dalal | Top |
Court Confirms Law Firm's $470,937 Arbitral Award for Work Before Discharge as Counsel | |
Clover v. Shiva Realty of Mulberry Inc. | Top |
Putative Class Plaintiffs' Counsel Awarded $33,035 Under FLSA Fee Shifting Provision | |
Tailored Lighting Inc. v. Osram Sylvania Products Inc. | Top |
Decision Light Bulb's Patent Invalid for Lack Of Enablement Denied Reconsideration | |
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
Outside Counsel: Free Speech and the Impact of 'Snyder v. Phelps' on New York | Top |
Kenneth G. Schwarz, of counsel to Cozen O'Connor, analyzes the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that members of the Westboro Baptist Church were entitled to First Amendment protection for their protests at military funerals around the country where placards routinely suggest that God killed the service member because of America's sinful ways, and how the ruling will require New York courts to rethink their four-part test on the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment