The latest from NYLJ.com
- Dispute Resolved Over Overlapping GL and D&O Insurance Policies
- OCA Contacts Unions On Feasibility of Furloughs
- Actions Seeking to Hold Merrill Officers Liable for Losses Dismissed
- TRO Preserves Rent Subsidies From City's Budget Cuts
- Lawyers Overcome County's Opposition to Win a Neglect Finding for a Mexican Abuse Victim
- High Court Leaves Intact State Ruling on DMV Records
- News In Brief
- Justices Appear Skeptical of Certifying Class for Bias Action Against Wal-Mart
- Circuit Mulls Damages in Copyright Act
- Clarification
- Matter of Trinidad v. New York Housing Authority
- Matter of Mason v. New York Housing Authority
- Matter of Mapama Corp. v. New York City Loft Board
- Red Hook Meat Corp. v. Bogopa-Columbia Inc.
- Matter of Tulip Gardens Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, Village of Hempstead
- Taylor v. Taylor
- Bechtel Do Brasil Construções Ltda. v. UEG Araucária Ltda.
- Soto v. Astrue
- Silver Entertainment LLC v. Rabin
- Clark v. Astrue
- Boykins v. Community Development Corp. of Long Island
- Outside Counsel: Can Certificate of Insurance Estop Insurer From Denying Coverage?
Dispute Resolved Over Overlapping GL and D&O Insurance Policies | Top |
In their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein, a partner at Schulte Roth & Zabel, and Theodore A. Keyes, special counsel at the firm, analyze a recent Court of Appleas decision held that the duty to defend owed by a general liability carrier required the GL carrier to defend the insured against all claims in the underlying lawsuit, even where many of the claims in the lawsuit were potentially covered under a directors' and officers' policy issued by another insurer and only one of the claims was potentially covered by the GL policy. | |
OCA Contacts Unions On Feasibility of Furloughs | Top |
Actions Seeking to Hold Merrill Officers Liable for Losses Dismissed | Top |
TRO Preserves Rent Subsidies From City's Budget Cuts | Top |
Lawyers Overcome County's Opposition to Win a Neglect Finding for a Mexican Abuse Victim | Top |
High Court Leaves Intact State Ruling on DMV Records | Top |
News In Brief | Top |
Justices Appear Skeptical of Certifying Class for Bias Action Against Wal-Mart | Top |
Circuit Mulls Damages in Copyright Act | Top |
Clarification | Top |
Matter of Trinidad v. New York Housing Authority | Top |
Tenant Loses Bid to Reverse Decision Denying Petition on Default Judgment | |
Matter of Mason v. New York Housing Authority | Top |
Decision Denying Tenant's Application To Reopen Default Ruled Arbitrary, Annulled | |
Matter of Mapama Corp. v. New York City Loft Board | Top |
Motion to Set Aside Decision Denying Extension to Legalize Lofts Is Denied | |
Red Hook Meat Corp. v. Bogopa-Columbia Inc. | Top |
Motion Seeking Arbitration Is Denied; Tenant Failed to Comply With Lease on Notice | |
Matter of Tulip Gardens Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, Village of Hempstead | Top |
Denial of Use Variance to Gas Station Owners Is Remanded for Issuance | |
Taylor v. Taylor | Top |
Same-Sex Spouse Did Not Waive Right To Maintain Partition Action Before Divorce | |
Bechtel Do Brasil Construções Ltda. v. UEG Araucária Ltda. | Top |
Court Erred in Finding Power Plant Time Issues Not Governed by Arbitration Pact | |
Soto v. Astrue | Top |
Law Judge Erred By Giving Inadequate Time To Review Expert's Report Before Decision | |
Silver Entertainment LLC v. Rabin | Top |
Court Explains Refusal to Increase Award to Include 13 Months of Salary | |
Clark v. Astrue | Top |
Nationwide Class, Relief Deemed Appropriate Given Invalid Policy's Nationwide Application | |
Boykins v. Community Development Corp. of Long Island | Top |
'Goldberg' Not Met in Section 8 Subsidy's End; Landlord Did Not State Reasons for Decision | |
Outside Counsel: Can Certificate of Insurance Estop Insurer From Denying Coverage? | Top |
Denise Marra DePekary and Blake Palmer of Carroll, McNulty & Kull write that although the parties in Ellicott Square settled, the split among the Appellate Departments on whether a certificate of insurance serves as evidence of coverage remains. With this issue ripe for consideration by the Court of Appeals, it's useful to examine how the Second Circuit in Ellicott Square framed the issue. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment