The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Wintery Mix: Guidance On Substantive and Procedural Issues
- Air Bag Warning Claim Preempted; 'Scarlet Letter' Sanction Ordered
- Albany: Client Protection Fund Sees Spike in Claims and Payouts in 2010
- Judge Applies Attorney Ethics Rules to Disqualify Whistleblowers From Federal Qui Tam Lawsuit
- Divorcing Wife Cleared to Sue Husband for Theft of Academic Paper
- News In Brief
- Transcripts Show Alleged Inside Trader's Attempts to Avoid Detection
- Obituary: William R. LaMarca
- Correction
- Gerber Finance Inc. v. Oved Diamond Co. Ltd.
- Bank of Smithtown v. Minetta Properties Inc.
- Bank v. Russo
- Estate of Jack E. Maurer
- Wisniewski v. PACOA
- DaSilva & Hilowitz LLP v. Style
- BLD Productions LLC v. Viacom Inc.
- Scottrade Inc. v. BroCo Investments Inc.
- Agoro v. United States
- In re: Assoc. of Graphic Communications Inc.
- Matter of Taub
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: 'United States v. Burden': An Errant Exercise in Evidence Law
| Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
| Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
| Wintery Mix: Guidance On Substantive and Procedural Issues | Top |
| In her Trusts and Estates Update, Ilene Sherwyn Cooper, a partner with Farrell Fritz, writes that just as this winter has provided us with a mix of sun, clouds, snow, sleet and ice, so, too, has the Surrogate's Court and Appellate Division provided us with an array of opinions to instruct and guide us on substantive and procedural issues affecting trusts and estates practice. | |
| Air Bag Warning Claim Preempted; 'Scarlet Letter' Sanction Ordered | Top |
| In his Products Liability column, Herzfeld & Rubin member Michael Hoenig discusses how federal preemption of particular automotive claims continue to be a battleground and how the recent Morris v. Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc. decision holds such a warnings claim to be preempted notwithstanding the Supreme Court's Williamson decision in March. | |
| Albany: Client Protection Fund Sees Spike in Claims and Payouts in 2010 | Top |
| Judge Applies Attorney Ethics Rules to Disqualify Whistleblowers From Federal Qui Tam Lawsuit | Top |
| Divorcing Wife Cleared to Sue Husband for Theft of Academic Paper | Top |
| News In Brief | Top |
| Transcripts Show Alleged Inside Trader's Attempts to Avoid Detection | Top |
| Obituary: William R. LaMarca | Top |
| Correction | Top |
| Gerber Finance Inc. v. Oved Diamond Co. Ltd. | Top |
| Partial Summary Judgment on Replevin Claim Granted Pursuant to Loan Agreement | |
| Bank of Smithtown v. Minetta Properties Inc. | Top |
| Court Finds Meritless Mortgagor's Claims Of Bad Faith, Fraud by Bank | |
| Bank v. Russo | Top |
| Partial Payments on Account Indicate Debtor Owes Amount Due, Judge Says | |
| Estate of Jack E. Maurer | Top |
| Decedent's Wife Motion to Remove Preliminary Executors Is Dismissed | |
| Wisniewski v. PACOA | Top |
| No Evidence Found That Defendant Intentionally Destroyed Video Evidence | |
| DaSilva & Hilowitz LLP v. Style | Top |
| Release Did Not Extinguish Husband's Obligation to Pay Wife's Legal Fees | |
| BLD Productions LLC v. Viacom Inc. | Top |
| Court Explains Dismissal of Breach Claims Over Recording of Aretha Franklin Concert | |
| Scottrade Inc. v. BroCo Investments Inc. | Top |
| Broker Who Reimbursed Defrauded Customers Lacks Standing to Sue for Fraud | |
| Agoro v. United States | Top |
| Abuse of Writ Doctrine Cited in Denial Of Habeas Repeating Ineffectiveness Claims | |
| In re: Assoc. of Graphic Communications Inc. | Top |
| Evicted, Bankrupt Business Tenant Need Not Pay Post-Petition Administrative Rent | |
| Matter of Taub | Top |
| Dilatory Actions, Judicial Process Abuse Noted in Upholding of Trustee Appointment | |
| Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
| Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
| Outside Counsel: 'United States v. Burden': An Errant Exercise in Evidence Law | Top |
| Litigator Marc Fernich analyzes a Second Circuit case that addressed tow issues: First, a novel application of the Confrontation Clause to recorded remarks by a wired government informant who did not testify at trial and was thus unavailable for cross-examination; and second, more the admissibility of prior consistent statements by an impeached government witness. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment