The latest from Law.com - National Law Journal
- OPINION: 'Mapp v. Ohio' 50 years later
- OPINION: Compliance programs pay dividends
- 'Therasense': the Federal Circuit overstepped
- The anti-innovation patent reform act of 2011
| OPINION: 'Mapp v. Ohio' 50 years later | Top |
| Critics of the exclusionary rule bewail its heavy costs. But the Fourth Amendment itself imposes these costs. | |
| OPINION: Compliance programs pay dividends | Top |
| In the face of public anger at Wall Street and increased DOJ and SEC scrutiny, a company may not find a better investment than a strong compliance program. | |
| 'Therasense': the Federal Circuit overstepped | Top |
| The purpose of an appellate court is to apply the law set by Congress and the Supreme Court ? not to put a finger to the wind, assess the volume of litigation on an issue, such as inequitable conduct claims, and apply its judgment that it is a 'plague' because it gets raised too often. | |
| The anti-innovation patent reform act of 2011 | Top |
| The pending "America Invents Act" will diminish innovation and should not be enacted. If enacted, the resulting statute is likely to be repealed, but only after a huge waste of time, effort and taxpayers' money. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
| You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment