Y! Alert: NYLJ.com

Yahoo! Alerts
My Alerts

The latest from NYLJ.com

• Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
• Clarification of Summary Judgment Standard
• Crossroads Between Grand Jury Subpoenas and Civil Protective Orders
• Judge Should Have Instructed Jury on Witness' Pay, Panel Says
• 2 Lawyers Leave Thompson Wigdor After Sanction
• Experts Say High Court Win for Investors Does Not Signal a Trend
• Former Cleary Managing Partner Walker Joins Lazard
• Judge Blasts Lawyer Over 'Greatest Hits' Defense
• Panel Sets Interest Rate For Damages in '93 Bombing
• Personal Notes on Lawyers
• Ex-IMF Chief Pleads Not Guilty to Rape Charges
• Zweig v. Tolchin
• Matter of Bluestar Properties inc. v. NYS Division of Housing & Community Renewal
• Scott v. Ackerman
• Flushing Savings Bank v. 509 Rogers LLC
• 180 Prospect Park West LLC v. Quilles
• Coleman v. Murray
• Hubbard v. MySpace Inc.
• In re M/V Rickmers Genoa Litigation
• Aboeid v. Saudi Arabian Airlines Inc.
• Vam Check Cashing Corp. v. Federal Insurance Co.
• Mahran v. Benderson Development Co. LLC
• Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
• Outside Counsel: How Paying Premiums Can Thwart Rescission of Life Insurance Contract

---

Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon	Top
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds
Clarification of Summary Judgment Standard	Top
In their Medical Malpractice column, Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore's Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier review a recent Second Department decision holding that a plaintiff is required to establish the existence of an issue of fact as to causation in opposition to summary judgment only after a moving defendant has satisfied its burden on that issue by submitting proof that its malpractice did not cause any injury.
Crossroads Between Grand Jury Subpoenas and Civil Protective Orders	Top
In their White-Collar Crime column, Robert G. Morvillo and Robert J. Anello, partners at Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, write: Civil protective orders play an indispensible role mitigating the effects of the federal system's liberal discovery rules by protecting the parties' privacy and confidentiality concerns. Currently, circuit courts disagree as to the rules to be applied when the power given a grand jury conflicts with a court's authority to protect the confidentiality and secrecy of the information sought. This disagreement raises serious issues for practitioners representing clients in parallel proceedings.
Judge Should Have Instructed Jury on Witness' Pay, Panel Says	Top
2 Lawyers Leave Thompson Wigdor After Sanction	Top
Experts Say High Court Win for Investors Does Not Signal a Trend	Top
Former Cleary Managing Partner Walker Joins Lazard	Top
Judge Blasts Lawyer Over 'Greatest Hits' Defense	Top
Panel Sets Interest Rate For Damages in '93 Bombing	Top
Personal Notes on Lawyers	Top
Ex-IMF Chief Pleads Not Guilty to Rape Charges	Top
Zweig v. Tolchin	Top
Successful Bidder on Condo Is Denied Motion to Be Relieved of Sale Terms
Matter of Bluestar Properties inc. v. NYS Division of Housing & Community Renewal	Top
Owner Is Denied Motion to Overturn Agency's Denial of Rent Reduction Review
Scott v. Ackerman	Top
Ex-Tenant Granted Dismissal of Claims For Breach of Lease, Additional Rent
Flushing Savings Bank v. 509 Rogers LLC	Top
Tenants Denied Vacatur of Foreclosure Judgment; Sale Set Aside for Lack of Notice
180 Prospect Park West LLC v. Quilles	Top
Premises Description in Predicate Notice Found Legally Insufficient
Coleman v. Murray	Top
Tenant Granted Motion to Be Restored To Single Room in Subject Premises
Hubbard v. MySpace Inc.	Top
Disclosures Under State Magistrate's Warrant Did Not Violate Stored Communications Act
In re M/V Rickmers Genoa Litigation	Top
Hague-Visby Rules Limit Shipowners' Liability in Actions Following Explosion
Aboeid v. Saudi Arabian Airlines Inc.	Top
Jury Demand, Immaterial Claims Struck In Travelers' Bias Suit Against Foreign Airline
Vam Check Cashing Corp. v. Federal Insurance Co.	Top
'Overt Act,' 'Cognizance of' Is Construed In Grant of Judgment for 'Robbery'
Mahran v. Benderson Development Co. LLC	Top
Court Denies Reconsideration of Ruling On Disability Act Confidentiality Breach
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority	Top
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience
Outside Counsel: How Paying Premiums Can Thwart Rescission of Life Insurance Contract	Top
Eve-Lynn Gisonni of Gissoni & Harms writes that all life insurance contracts issued in New York contain a two year incontestability clause preventing the insurer from contesting or rescinding the policy for statements made in the application for insurance after two years from the date of issuance of the policy, during the insured's lifetime.

CREATE MORE ALERTS:

Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted

Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope

Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more

News - Only the news you want, delivered!

Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more

Weather - Get today's weather conditions

You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089.