The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Interest Toll, 'Langan' Decision, Technical Deficiencies in Denials
- Lawyer in Mortgage Fraud Is Sentenced to 5 Years
- Study Backs Leniency for Domestic Abuse Victims Who Break the Law
- Immigration Cases Continue to Grow, According to Report
- News Corp.'s Longtime General Counsel Resigns
- Officials Propose Closing Four Juvenile Centers
- Fairfield Investors Appeal Decision in Madoff Suits
- State Judge Lifts Ban on Cigarette Tax Collections
- Poker Case Defendant Loses Bid for Bail
- Personal Notes on Lawyers
- Correction
- Nascimento v. Bridgehampton Construction Corp.
- Verizon New York Inc. v. City of New York
- Henry v. New York City Housing Authority
- Sharaf v. Sotnychuk
- R.E.G. Flushing Medical PC v. Integon National Ins. Co.
- Whitcomb v. Original Design Construction Corp.
- Gatell v. Sears Home Improvement Products
- Spavone v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Services
- Tramposch v. Winter
- Garcia v. Holder
- Kaminski v. Anderson
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: High Court Rules on Duty of Care Owed to School Bus Riders
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Interest Toll, 'Langan' Decision, Technical Deficiencies in Denials | Top |
In his No-Fault Insurance Wrap-Up, David M. Barshay, a member of Baker, Sanders, Barshay, Grossman, Fass, Muhlstock and Neuwirth, writes that where a defendant has not established the proper mailing of the denial of claim form, the claim is considered not to have been denied and payment of benefits will therefore be considered to be 'overdue' within the meaning of Insurance Law | |
Lawyer in Mortgage Fraud Is Sentenced to 5 Years | Top |
Study Backs Leniency for Domestic Abuse Victims Who Break the Law | Top |
Immigration Cases Continue to Grow, According to Report | Top |
News Corp.'s Longtime General Counsel Resigns | Top |
Officials Propose Closing Four Juvenile Centers | Top |
Fairfield Investors Appeal Decision in Madoff Suits | Top |
State Judge Lifts Ban on Cigarette Tax Collections | Top |
Poker Case Defendant Loses Bid for Bail | Top |
Personal Notes on Lawyers | Top |
Correction | Top |
Nascimento v. Bridgehampton Construction Corp. | Top |
Issues Exist on Subcontractor's Liability For Worker's Injury on Renovation Project | |
Verizon New York Inc. v. City of New York | Top |
Plaintiff Loses Relation Back Doctrine Bid To Amend Complaint to Add Codefendant | |
Henry v. New York City Housing Authority | Top |
Conflicting Evidence Over Existence Of Working Smoke Detector Dooms Dismissal | |
Sharaf v. Sotnychuk | Top |
Claims for Fees, Civil Conspiracy Are Denied; Claims for Unit Damages Sufficiently Pleaded | |
R.E.G. Flushing Medical PC v. Integon National Ins. Co. | Top |
'Innocent Third Party' Medical Provider Found Eligible for No-Fault Payment | |
Whitcomb v. Original Design Construction Corp. | Top |
Homeowners Granted Return of Deposit Despite Failure to Prove Contract Breach | |
Gatell v. Sears Home Improvement Products | Top |
Wife Estopped From Arguing Husband Lacked Authority to Approve Central A.C. Installation | |
Spavone v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Services | Top |
Inmate Loses Asbestos Exposure Indifference Claim Arising From Prison Chapel Work | |
Tramposch v. Winter | Top |
Band Manager's Federal Suit Denied Stay Until California Agency Action's Resolution | |
Garcia v. Holder | Top |
Detention Did Not Violate Due Process Clause; Habeas Petition Found Untimely | |
Kaminski v. Anderson | Top |
Town Worker Raises Issue if Job Punishments Were Retaliation for 2008 Election Campaign | |
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
Outside Counsel: High Court Rules on Duty of Care Owed to School Bus Riders | Top |
Emina Poricanin, an appellate court attorney for the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, discusses a recent decision which held that if a bus that transports students is not a "school bus," as defined by §375(20), then the bus driver does not have to comply with 1174(b), and argues that students riding city buses to school are exposed to the same dangers that students riding yellow school buses encounter and should not receive less protection. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment