The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Clarification of Summary Judgment Standard
- Crossroads Between Grand Jury Subpoenas and Civil Protective Orders
- Judge Should Have Instructed Jury on Witness' Pay, Panel Says
- 2 Lawyers Leave Thompson Wigdor After Sanction
- Experts Say High Court Win for Investors Does Not Signal a Trend
- Former Cleary Managing Partner Walker Joins Lazard
- Judge Blasts Lawyer Over 'Greatest Hits' Defense
- Panel Sets Interest Rate For Damages in '93 Bombing
- Personal Notes on Lawyers
- Ex-IMF Chief Pleads Not Guilty to Rape Charges
- People v. Morales
- People v. Davis
- D.B. Global Resoruces Inc. v. Smith
- Hartman v. Milbel Enterprises Inc.
- Audi of Smithtown Inc. v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc.
- Matter of E. Hampton v. Zoning Board of Appeals, Village of E. Hampton
- Matter of Stop & Shop Cos. Inc. v. Assessor, Bd. of Assessors
- Matter of Brown v. Bd. of Ed., Mahopac Central School District
- Community Healthcare Assoc. of New York v. N.Y. State Dept. of Health
- LoPresti v. Pace Press Inc.
- Utilisave LLC v. Spark Energy LP
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: How Paying Premiums Can Thwart Rescission of Life Insurance Contract
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Clarification of Summary Judgment Standard | Top |
In their Medical Malpractice column, Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore's Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier review a recent Second Department decision holding that a plaintiff is required to establish the existence of an issue of fact as to causation in opposition to summary judgment only after a moving defendant has satisfied its burden on that issue by submitting proof that its malpractice did not cause any injury. | |
Crossroads Between Grand Jury Subpoenas and Civil Protective Orders | Top |
In their White-Collar Crime column, Robert G. Morvillo and Robert J. Anello, partners at Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, write: Civil protective orders play an indispensible role mitigating the effects of the federal system's liberal discovery rules by protecting the parties' privacy and confidentiality concerns. Currently, circuit courts disagree as to the rules to be applied when the power given a grand jury conflicts with a court's authority to protect the confidentiality and secrecy of the information sought. This disagreement raises serious issues for practitioners representing clients in parallel proceedings. | |
Judge Should Have Instructed Jury on Witness' Pay, Panel Says | Top |
2 Lawyers Leave Thompson Wigdor After Sanction | Top |
Experts Say High Court Win for Investors Does Not Signal a Trend | Top |
Former Cleary Managing Partner Walker Joins Lazard | Top |
Judge Blasts Lawyer Over 'Greatest Hits' Defense | Top |
Panel Sets Interest Rate For Damages in '93 Bombing | Top |
Personal Notes on Lawyers | Top |
Ex-IMF Chief Pleads Not Guilty to Rape Charges | Top |
People v. Morales | Top |
Gang Shootings Not 'Crimes of Terrorism'; 'Civilian Population's' Coercion Not Intended | |
People v. Davis | Top |
Juror Misconduct Not Found Where Jury Relied on Attorney-Juror's 'Expertise' | |
D.B. Global Resoruces Inc. v. Smith | Top |
Testimony, Credible Evidence Revealed Plaintiff Entitled to Reasonable Fees | |
Hartman v. Milbel Enterprises Inc. | Top |
Limitations Period Tolled Until Mothers Are Appointed Guardians of Infant Distributees | |
Audi of Smithtown Inc. v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc. | Top |
Court Says Bonus Programs Violated Franchised Motor Vehicle Dealer Act | |
Matter of E. Hampton v. Zoning Board of Appeals, Village of E. Hampton | Top |
Zoning Board's Denial of Variances, Permit To Library Found Arbitrary, Irrational | |
Matter of Stop & Shop Cos. Inc. v. Assessor, Bd. of Assessors | Top |
Fractional Lessee Empowered to Commence Tax Certiorari Challenge to Tax Assessment | |
Matter of Brown v. Bd. of Ed., Mahopac Central School District | Top |
Teacher's Maternity Leave Does Not Toll Probationary Period for Calendar Time | |
Community Healthcare Assoc. of New York v. N.Y. State Dept. of Health | Top |
State, Health Department Immune in Health Centers' Suit Over Medicaid Underpayments | |
LoPresti v. Pace Press Inc. | Top |
U.S. DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment | |
Utilisave LLC v. Spark Energy LP | Top |
Hospital's Agent Lacks Article III Standing To Sue Texas Energy Firm Over False Billing | |
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
Outside Counsel: How Paying Premiums Can Thwart Rescission of Life Insurance Contract | Top |
Eve-Lynn Gisonni of Gissoni & Harris writes that all life insurance contracts issued in New York contain a two year incontestability clause preventing the insurer from contesting or rescinding the policy for statements made in the application for insurance after two years from the date of issuance of the policy, during the insured's lifetime. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment