The latest from NYLJ.com
- Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon
- Sorting Out Claims Of Undue Influence
- Summary Judgment Practice Refined by a New Decision
- District Court Reaps Benefits of Hardworking Senior Judges
- Albany: Defense Errors Warrant New Trial in Sex Assault Case, Panel Finds
- Circuit Rejects Financial Penalty for Insider Trading by Ex-Lawyer
- Pay: Cuomo Appointments Finalize Judicial Pay Panel
- Appeals Court Clarifies MERS Role in Foreclosures
- Panel: 'Naked Dancing' Not a Tax-Exempt Performance
- Personal Notes on Lawyers
- Nigerian Plaintiffs Seek High Court Review of Corporate Liability Under Alien Tort Law
- Obituary: Maite Aquino
- Rapetti v. E. 51st St. Develop. Co. LLC
- People v. Jones
- Matter of A.K. v. A.S.
- People v. M.
- People v. Ashley
- Matter of Deonna W.
- Genon Mid-Atlantic LLC v. Stone & Webster Inc.
- Ragin v. Newburgh Enlarged City School District
- San Francisco Tech. v. Bayer Corp.
- Massaro v. Dept. of Education of the City of New York
- Matter of Extradition of Kapoor
- Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority
- Outside Counsel: 'Matrixx' Offers Insight on Corporate Disclosures of Adverse Events
Richard Green (Fine Paintings) v. McClendon | Top |
Woman Loses Breach Suit Over $4.2 Million Painting; E-Mails Satisfied Statute of Frauds | |
Sorting Out Claims Of Undue Influence | Top |
In her Trusts and Estates Update, Ilene Sherwyn Cooper, a partner with Farrell Fritz, writes that undue influence is often the linchpin to the outcome of a matter, and as such, relevant to its strategy. This is most pointedly revealed, she says, by opinions rendered within the past three months in which the issue of undue influence played a primary role in the courts' determinations. | |
Summary Judgment Practice Refined by a New Decision | Top |
In his Products Liability column, Michael Hoenig, a member of Herzfeld & Rubin, writes that alarmists could read atomized sentences in a recent Court of Appeals opinion as portents of a changed or changing products liability law for New York, but the Court has used the extremity of liability boundaries along with picturesque language in order to punctuate the requisite showing on a summary judgment motion. | |
District Court Reaps Benefits of Hardworking Senior Judges | Top |
Albany: Defense Errors Warrant New Trial in Sex Assault Case, Panel Finds | Top |
Circuit Rejects Financial Penalty for Insider Trading by Ex-Lawyer | Top |
Pay: Cuomo Appointments Finalize Judicial Pay Panel | Top |
Appeals Court Clarifies MERS Role in Foreclosures | Top |
Panel: 'Naked Dancing' Not a Tax-Exempt Performance | Top |
Personal Notes on Lawyers | Top |
Nigerian Plaintiffs Seek High Court Review of Corporate Liability Under Alien Tort Law | Top |
Obituary: Maite Aquino | Top |
Rapetti v. E. 51st St. Develop. Co. LLC | Top |
Plaintiff Waived Privilege of Sealed Records By Placing Underlying Conduct at Issue | |
People v. Jones | Top |
Unavailability of Arresting Officer Ruled Exceptional Circumstance in Speedy Trial Case | |
Matter of A.K. v. A.S. | Top |
Saying It Cannot 'Regulate Internal Affairs Of Home,' Court Dismisses Custody Petition | |
People v. M. | Top |
Girlfriend Guilty of Attempted Identity Theft By Using Boyfriend's Data for Purchases | |
People v. Ashley | Top |
Court Dismisses Traffic Infraction Charges in Interest of Justice | |
Matter of Deonna W. | Top |
Court Concludes It Fulfilled Its Duty to Make Determination on Suitability of Relatives | |
Genon Mid-Atlantic LLC v. Stone & Webster Inc. | Top |
Subpoenaed 'Dual Purpose' Audit Papers Not Attorney Work Product; Disclosure Compelled | |
Ragin v. Newburgh Enlarged City School District | Top |
Affidavit's Introduction Under 'Residual' Hearsay Exception Negates Cross-Exam Right | |
San Francisco Tech. v. Bayer Corp. | Top |
False Patent Marking Qui Tam Suit Fails; Deceptive Intent Element Not Satisfied | |
Massaro v. Dept. of Education of the City of New York | Top |
Teacher's First Amendment Retaliation Claim Fails; Complaints Part of Public Employee Duty | |
Matter of Extradition of Kapoor | Top |
'Significant Delay' Compels Denial of Indian Extradition Request, Woman's Release on Bond | |
Cabrera v. NYC Housing Authority | Top |
Court Annuls Termination of Tenancy Found Shocking to Judicial Conscience | |
Outside Counsel: 'Matrixx' Offers Insight on Corporate Disclosures of Adverse Events | Top |
Latham & Watkins partner Robert J. Malionek discusses Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano and how the Supreme Court's opinion emphasizes that the materiality of information a company omits depends on the information the company discloses and is more likely to be actionable when it is needed to balance otherwise positive statements about a company's products and future performance. | |
CREATE MORE ALERTS:
Auctions - Find out when new auctions are posted
Horoscopes - Receive your daily horoscope
Music - Get the newest Album Releases, Playlists and more
News - Only the news you want, delivered!
Stocks - Stay connected to the market with price quotes and more
Weather - Get today's weather conditions
You received this email because you subscribed to Yahoo! Alerts. Use this link to unsubscribe from this alert. To change your communications preferences for other Yahoo! business lines, please visit your Marketing Preferences. To learn more about Yahoo!'s use of personal information, including the use of web beacons in HTML-based email, please read our Privacy Policy. Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment